Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23321709›Full record

ArticleHeredity2013

Gene flow and gene flux shape evolutionary patterns of variation in Drosophila subobscura.

C Pegueroles, C F Aquadro, F Mestres, M Pascual

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Inversion invasions: when the genetic basis of local adaptation is concentrated within inversions in the face of gene flow.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The Cyclically SeasonalFrontiers in genetics · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Dense gene physical maps of the non-model species Drosophila subobscura.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

C PeguerolesDepartament de Genètica, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain. cintapq@gmail.com
C F Aquadro
F Mestres
M Pascual
Universitat de Barcelona · ESCornell University · US

Funding

Adaptive Protein Evolution of the Drosophila Germline Stem Cell Gene Bag of MarblesR01GM095793 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI AQUADRO, CHARLES F · 2011 to 2024
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM095793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene flow (defined as allele exchange between populations) and gene flux (defined as allele exchange during meiosis in heterokaryotypic females) are important factors decreasing genetic differentiation between populations and inversions. Many chromosomal inversions are under strong selection and their role in recombination reduction enhances the maintenance of their genetic distinctness. Here we analyze levels and patterns of nucleotide diversity, selection and demographic history, using 37 individuals of Drosophila subobscura from Mount Parnes (Greece) and Barcelona (Spain). Our sampling focused on two frequent O-chromosome arrangements that differ by two overlapping inversions (OST and O(3+4)), which are differentially adapted to the environment as observed by their opposing latitudinal clines in inversion frequencies. The six analyzed genes (Pif1A, Abi, Sqd, Yrt, Atpα and Fmr1) were selected for their location across the O-chromosome and their implication in thermal adaptation. Despite the extensive gene flux detected outside the inverted region, significant genetic differentiation between both arrangements was found inside it. However, high levels of gene flow were detected for all six genes when comparing the same arrangement among populations. These results suggest that the adaptive value of inversions is maintained, regardless of the lack of genetic differentiation within arrangements from different populations, and thus favors the Local Adaptation hypothesis over the Coadapted Genome hypothesis as the basis of the selection acting on inversions in these populations.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGene FlowAllelesAnimalsChromosome InversionDrosophilaGenetic DriftGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationPhylogenyRecombination, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID23321709
PMCPMC3656635
OpenAlexW1988887683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.