Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23321703›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2013

[Prevalence of chronic pain in Germany. A representative survey of the general population].

W Häuser, G Schmutzer, A Hinz, A Hilbert, E Brähler

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02747758 (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02747758 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Chronic Pain Patients With Neuropathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharite University, Berlin, GermanyRan2016 to 2021Enrolled17ConditionsNeuropathic Pain, NeuralgiaArmscathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. An Internet-Based Intervention for Chronic Pain.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Cyberful-Virtual reality in arm and hand rehabilitation].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Predictors of Psychological Distress in Women with Endometriosis during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W HäuserInnere Medizin I, Klinikum Saarbrücken gGmbH , Winterberg 1, 66119, Saarbrücken, Deutschland. whaeuser@klinikum-saarbruecken.de
G Schmutzer
A Hinz
A Hilbert
E Brähler
Leipzig University · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are no up to date data from representative samples of the general German population on the prevalence of debilitating pain and of pain diseases available.

methodsA cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of the German general population including persons ≥ 14 years of age was conducted in 2012 based on face-to-face interviews using standardized questionnaires. Chronic pain was assessed by the widespread pain index (WPI), disability by the subscales physical functioning and role function of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) and psychological distress by the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-4). Chronic pain with associated physical and social impairments was defined by at least one pain site over 3 months in the WPI and at least one response of a moderate or severe impairment in both subscales of the EORTC 30 QLQ-C30. Chronic pain with associated physical, mental and social impairment (pain disease) required in addition a probable depressive and/or anxiety disorder in the PHQ-4.

resultsA total of 2,515 out of 4,480 (56.1 %) of contacted persons finished the study of which 32.9 % reported chronic pain, 5.4 % reported chronic pain with associated physical and social impairments and 2.3 % associated physical, mental and social impairments. No participants with local pain (only one pain site) but 24.0 % of participants with widespread pain (6-19 pain sites) met the criteria of a pain disease.

conclusionsThe reports of chronic pain in epidemiological studies do not necessarily imply a suffering (physical, psychological and social impairment) from pain.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChronic PainCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23321703
OpenAlexW18308422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.