Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23321648›Full record

ReviewHearing research2013

A brief history of hair cell regeneration research and speculations on the future.

Edwin W Rubel, Stephanie A Furrer, Jennifer S Stone

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hearing research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mutation of the GDP-Fucose Biosynthesis GeneInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Analysis of miRNAs from Inner Ear Organoid-Derived Extracellular Vesicles.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Metabolic Profiling of Cochlear Organoids Identifies α-Ketoglutarate and NADAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Hearing Loss and Oxidative Stress: A Comprehensive Review.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. A Low Dose of Rapamycin Promotes Hair Cell Differentiation by Enriching SOX2Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Hair Cell Regeneration: From Animals to Humans.Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology · 2024
    Review

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edwin W RubelVirginia Merrill Bloedel Hearing Research Center and Department of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. rubel@uw.edu
Stephanie A Furrer
Jennifer S Stone
University of Washington · USBehavioral Tech Research, Inc. · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON RESEARCH CORE CENTERP30DC004661 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RUBEL, EDWIN W · 2000 to 2014
$11.1M
Auditory Neuroscience Traning ProgramT32DC005361 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Adrian KC Lee, DAVID J PERKEL · 2002 to 2026
$8.8M
REGULATION OF HAIR CELL DIFFERENTIATIONF32DC000181 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STONE, JENNIFER S. · 1995 to 1997
–
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC000181NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC004661NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC005361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Millions of people worldwide suffer from hearing and balance disorders caused by loss of the sensory hair cells that convert sound vibrations and head movements into electrical signals that are conveyed to the brain. In mammals, the great majority of hair cells are produced during embryogenesis. Hair cells that are lost after birth are virtually irreplaceable, leading to permanent disability. Other vertebrates, such as fish and amphibians, produce hair cells throughout life. However, hair cell replacement after damage to the mature inner ear was either not investigated or assumed to be impossible until studies in the late 1980s proved this to be false. Adult birds were shown to regenerate lost hair cells in the auditory sensory epithelium after noise- and ototoxic drug-induced damage. Since then, the field of hair cell regeneration has continued to investigate the capacity of the auditory and vestibular epithelia in vertebrates (fishes, birds, reptiles, and mammals) to regenerate hair cells and to recover function, the molecular mechanisms governing these regenerative capabilities, and the prospect of designing biologically-based treatments for hearing loss and balance disorders. Here, we review the major findings of the field during the past 25 years and speculate how future inner ear repair may one day be achieved.

Indexed as

RegenerationAnimalsCell TransplantationEar, InnerEpitheliumGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHair Cells, AuditoryHearing Loss, Noise-InducedHumansMitosisStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID23321648
PMCPMC3657556
OpenAlexW2155922247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.