Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23321623›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2013

Prenatal diagnostic testing of the Noonan syndrome genes in fetuses with abnormal ultrasound findings.

Ellen A Croonen, Willy M Nillesen, Kyra E Stuurman, Gretel Oudesluijs, Ingrid M B M van de Laar, Liesbeth Martens, Charlotte Ockeloen, Inge B Mathijssen, Marga Schepens, Martina Ruiterkamp-Versteeg and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Fetal hydrops and the Incremental yield of Next-generation sequencing over standard prenatal Diagnostic testing (FIND) study: prospective cohort study and meta-analysis.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Noonan syndrome: improving recognition and diagnosis.Archives of disease in childhood · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ellen A CroonenDepartment of Paediatrics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Willy M Nillesen
Kyra E Stuurman
Gretel Oudesluijs
Ingrid M B M van de Laar
Liesbeth Martens
Charlotte Ockeloen
Inge B Mathijssen
Marga Schepens
Martina Ruiterkamp-Versteeg
Hans Scheffer
Brigitte H W Faas
Ineke van der Burgt
Helger G Yntema
Radboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent studies on prenatal testing for Noonan syndrome (NS) in fetuses with an increased nuchal translucency (NT) and a normal karyotype, mutations have been reported in 9-16% of cases. In this study, DNA of 75 fetuses with a normal karyotype and abnormal ultrasound findings was tested in a diagnostic setting for mutations in (a subset of) the four most commonly mutated NS genes. A de novo mutation in either PTPN11, KRAS or RAF1 was detected in 13 fetuses (17.3%). Ultrasound findings were increased NT, distended jugular lymphatic sacs (JLS), hydrothorax, renal anomalies, polyhydramnios, cystic hygroma, cardiac anomalies, hydrops fetalis and ascites. A second group, consisting of anonymized DNA of 60 other fetuses with sonographic abnormalities, was tested for mutations in 10 NS genes. In this group, five possible pathogenic mutations have been identified (in PTPN11 (n=2), RAF1, BRAF and MAP2K1 (each n=1)). We recommend prenatal testing of PTPN11, KRAS and RAF1 in pregnancies with an increased NT and at least one of the following additional features: polyhydramnios, hydrops fetalis, renal anomalies, distended JLS, hydrothorax, cardiac anomalies, cystic hygroma and ascites. If possible, mutation analysis of BRAF and MAP2K1 should be considered.

Indexed as

Abortion, EugenicDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleHumansKaryotypeMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNoonan SyndromeNuchal Translucency MeasurementPregnancyProtein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 11Proto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)ras ProteinsKRAS protein, humanProtein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 11Proto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)PTPN11 protein, humanras Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23321623
PMCPMC3746261
OpenAlexW2007518585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.