Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23321508›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2013

Endocrine therapy in prostate cancer: time for reappraisal of risks, benefits and cost-effectiveness?

L Bourke, P Kirkbride, R Hooper, A J Rosario, T J A Chico, D J Rosario

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Incidence of the adverse effects of androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: a systematic literature review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

L BourkeDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, LondonE1 2AT, UK. d.j.rosario@sheffield.ac.uk
P Kirkbride
R Hooper
A J Rosario
T J A Chico
D J Rosario

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the 70 years following the first description of the benefits of surgical castration, despite advances in medical therapy e.g. cabazitaxel, enzalutamide, abiraterone, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the cornerstone of treatment for advanced prostate cancer. However, with increasing numbers of men undergoing PSA testing, the disease is being diagnosed earlier and the costs of ADT, with uncertain survival benefits and associated risks, have risen dramatically. Clinical studies of potent novel agents have shown survival benefits in advanced disease, but timing, risks and cost-effectiveness of treatment remain controversial. As new agents enter clinical practice, a comprehensive research strategy is essential to optimise benefits whilst minimising harm.

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalCardiovascular DiseasesCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMaleOrchiectomyProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsAndrogen AntagonistsAntineoplastic Agents, Hormonal

Identifiers

PMID23321508
PMCPMC3553523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.