Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23321274›Full record

ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2013

Development of a novel bioerodible dexamethasone implant for uveitis and postoperative cataract inflammation.

Srinivas Rao Chennamaneni, Christina Mamalis, Bonnie Archer, Zack Oakey, Balamurali K Ambati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Srinivas Rao ChennamaneniJohn A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, 65 Mario Capecchi Dr., Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
Christina Mamalis
Bonnie Archer
Zack Oakey
Balamurali K Ambati
University of Utah · US

Funding

University of Utah, Core Vision Research GrantP30EY014800 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI PAUL STEVEN BERNSTEIN · 2005 to 2026
$14.6M
The Role of Soluble Flt-1 and Raver2 in Ocular Vascular DemarcationsR01EY017950 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI AMBATI, BALAMURALI K · 2008 to 2021
$5.2M
Intraceptor Interference of VEGF PathwaysR01EY017182 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI AMBATI, BALAMURALI K · 2007 to 2017
$3.6M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014800NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017182NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delivery of anti-inflammatory steroids concurrently to both anterior and posterior segments of the eye is a challenge. The anterior ocular structures limit topical delivery. Injection can be disproportionately and repeatedly invasive and selective for only one ocular hemisphere. We developed a novel implant that can compensate for the limited conveyance of topical medicine and reduce the repetitive invasiveness of injection from the capsular bag allowing dexamethasone (DXM) delivery to both the anterior and posterior chambers. To establish proof of concept, microparticles were prepared with PLGA [poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide), 50:50, MW. 7000-17000], hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC), and DXM by oil-in-water emulsion/solvent evaporation technique. Zeatsizer Nano and SEM (scanning electron microscopy) results showed microspheres in the range of 8±1µm. The target load of DXM in the microparticles was ~20.0% with a % recovery of 99.9% (w/w). Dose related pharmacokinetics with near zero order kinetics was observed for up to 6 weeks in rabbits with intracapsular bag implants. DXM flow was bidirectional from the endocapsular space and significant concentrations were found in the anterior and posterior chambers after up to 6 weeks. Whereas, with topical drops the exposure was minimal in all the ocular tissues with greater systemic exposure. Intraocular pressure was normal in all of the study groups; slit lamp biomicroscopy examinations revealed that no cells or fibrin formation in the anterior and posterior chamber with implants but flare, cells and fibrin was present in the topical drops group. Histological examination revealed normal tissues and no signs of inflammation in all the groups. The implant did not migrate to the center of the eye or obstruct the visual axis. We believe these findings demonstrate the feasibility of drug delivery from the capsular bag to the anterior and posterior segments effectively compared to topical alternatives.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCataractDexamethasoneDrug ImplantsEyeFemaleMicrospheresParticle SizeRabbitsUveitisAnti-Inflammatory AgentsDexamethasoneDrug Implants

Identifiers

PMID23321274
PMCPMC3712833
OpenAlexW1968336091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.