ArticleBMC bioinformatics2012
Accuracy of RNA-Seq and its dependence on sequencing depth.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- MitoDelta: identifying mitochondrial DNA deletions at cell-type resolution from single-cell RNA sequencing data.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Harnessing AI-driven reverse docking in drug discovery: a comprehensive review of opportunities, challenges, and emerging trends.Journal of molecular modeling · 2025Review
- Evaluating Genome Assemblies for Optimized Completeness and Accuracy of Reference Gene Sequences in Wheat, Rye, and Triticale.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Transcriptomics for Clinical and Experimental Biology Research: Hang on a Seq.Advanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Review
- Longitudinal Monitoring of DNA Viral Loads in Transplant Patients Using Quantitative Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The functional false discovery rate with applications to genomics.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Local sequence and sequencing depth dependent accuracy of RNA-seq reads.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Article
- Article
- Reproducibility of Illumina platform deep sequencing errors allows accurate determination of DNA barcodes in cells.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Article
- Data quality aware analysis of differential expression in RNA-seq with NOISeq R/Bioc package.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Polyester: simulating RNA-seq datasets with differential transcript expression.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015Article
- Successful Recovery of Nuclear Protein-Coding Genes from Small Insects in Museums Using Illumina Sequencing.PloS one · 2015Article
- Reprogramming of Yersinia from virulent to persistent mode revealed by complex in vivo RNA-seq analysis.PLoS pathogens · 2015Article
- A comparison of RNA-seq and exon arrays for whole genome transcription profiling of the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain in the rat.Molecular pain · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe cost of DNA sequencing has undergone a dramatical reduction in the past decade. As a result, sequencing technologies have been increasingly applied to genomic research. RNA-Seq is becoming a common technique for surveying gene expression based on DNA sequencing. As it is not clear how increased sequencing capacity has affected measurement accuracy of mRNA, we sought to investigate that relationship.
resultWe empirically evaluate the accuracy of repeated gene expression measurements using RNA-Seq. We identify library preparation steps prior to DNA sequencing as the main source of error in this process. Studying three datasets, we show that the accuracy indeed improves with the sequencing depth. However, the rate of improvement as a function of sequence reads is generally slower than predicted by the binomial distribution. We therefore used the beta-binomial distribution to model the overdispersion. The overdispersion parameters we introduced depend explicitly on the number of reads so that the resulting statistical uncertainty is consistent with the empirical data that measurement accuracy increases with the sequencing depth. The overdispersion parameters were determined by maximizing the likelihood. We shown that our modified beta-binomial model had lower false discovery rate than the binomial or the pure beta-binomial models.
conclusionWe proposed a novel form of overdispersion guaranteeing that the accuracy improves with sequencing depth. We demonstrated that the new form provides a better fit to the data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.