Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23320787›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2013

Ten-year trajectory of potentially inappropriate medications in very old women: importance of cognitive status.

Alain Koyama, Michael Steinman, Kristine Ensrud, Teresa A Hillier, Kristine Yaffe

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Use of Benzodiazepines in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review of Literature.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2015
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alain KoyamaNorthern California Institute for Research and Education, San Francisco, California, USA. alain.koyama@va.gov
Michael Steinman
Kristine Ensrud
Teresa A Hillier
Kristine Yaffe

Funding

Study of Osteoporotic FracturesR01AG005407 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI CUMMINGS, STEVEN RON, YAFFE, KRISTINE · 1986 to 2016
$23.2M
Changes in Sleep and Cognition in Older WomenR01AG026720 · NIA · CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MED CTR RES INSTITUTE · PI STONE, KATIE L, YAFFE, KRISTINE · 2006 to 2016
$7.5M
Study of Osteoporotic FracturesR01AG005394 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI ENSRUD, KRISTINE · 1986 to 2015
$6.1M
STUDY OF OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES: VERTEBRAL FRACTURESR01AR035583 · NIAMS · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HILLIER, TERESA A · 1986 to 2005
$3.2M
Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF)R01AG027574 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HILLIER, TERESA A · 2006 to 2015
$2.6M
Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF)-Pittsburgh ClinicR01AG027576 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CAULEY, JANE ANN · 2006 to 2015
$2.4M
Study of Osteoporotic FracturesR01AR035582 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CAULEY, JANE · 1986 to 2005
$2.4M
Study of Osteoporotic FracturesR01AR035584 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI HOCHBERG, MARC C. · 1986 to 2005
$2.1M
Predictors & Outcomes of Cognitive Trajectories in the Oldest OldK24AG031155 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI YAFFE, KRISTINE · 2007 to 2020
$1.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR035582NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR035583NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR035584NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR35582NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR35584NIA NIH HHS K24 AG031155NIA NIH HHS R01 AG005394NIA NIH HHS R01 AG005407NIA NIH HHS R01 AG026720NIA NIH HHS R01 AG027574NIA NIH HHS R01 AG027576PHS HHS R01 R35583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine which older adults tend to receive potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), how this may differ according to cognitive status, and how the trajectories of PIM use change over time.

designTen-year longitudinal cohort study.

settingThree clinical sites in the United States.

participantsOne thousand four hundred eighty-four community-dwelling women aged 75 and older. MEASUREMENTS: At follow-up, cognitive status was ascertained and classified as normal, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or dementia. Beers 2003 criteria and other literature were used to identify PIMs from detailed medication inventory performed at three time points. Anticholinergic load was measured using the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale (ACB), which assigns medications a value from 0 to 3 depending on anticholinergic properties.

resultsAt baseline, 23.9% of women were taking at least one PIM and the mean ± SD ACB score was 1.41 ± 1.69. The most frequently reported PIMs were anticholinergics (15.2%), benzodiazepines (8.6%), and antispasmodics (8.0%). Over 10 years, PIM use increased for women with dementia (24.9-33.1%; P = .02) but remained fairly constant for women with MCI (23.9-23.0%; P = .84) and normal cognitive status (22.2-19.8%; P = .17). Mean ACB score increased significantly (P < .001) over time for all groups (dementia: 1.28-2.05; MCI: 0.98-1.66; normal: 0.99-1.48).

conclusionPIM use and anticholinergic load in a community-dwelling population of older women was high, especially in women who later developed dementia. Future guidelines should limit PIM use and seek safer alternatives.

Indexed as

ForecastingAgedAged, 80 and overDementiaDrug UtilizationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMedication ErrorsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23320787
PMCPMC3795413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.