Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23320650›Full record

Trial reportBMC gastroenterology2013

Pre-study protocol MagPEP: a multicentre randomized controlled trial of magnesium sulphate in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Gabriele Fluhr, Julia Mayerle, Eckhard Weber, Ali Aghdassi, Peter Simon, Thomas Gress, Thomas Seufferlein, Joachim Mössner, Andreas Stallmach, Thomas Rösch and 20 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02684019 (Goal Directed Propofol Sedation With Magnesium Sulphate Versus Dexmedetomidine for ERCP Procedure), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02684019 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Goal Directed Propofol Sedation With Magnesium Sulphate Versus Dexmedetomidine for ERCP Procedure

TypeinterventionalSponsorTheodor Bilharz Research InstituteRan2016 to 2016Enrolled60ConditionsLack of Drug ActionArmsDexmedetomidine, Magnesium Sulphate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Pancreas and Known Factors of Acute Pancreatitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Do Animal Models of Acute Pancreatitis Reproduce Human Disease?Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabriele FluhrCentral Endoscopy and Department of Medicine A, University Medicine Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Straße, Greifswald, 17475, Germany.
Julia Mayerle
Eckhard Weber
Ali Aghdassi
Peter Simon
Thomas Gress
Thomas Seufferlein
Joachim Mössner
Andreas Stallmach
Thomas Rösch
Martina Müller
Britta Siegmund
Petra Büchner-Steudel
Ina Zuber-Jerger
Marcus Kantowski
Albrecht Hoffmeister
Jonas Rosendahl
Thomas Linhart
Jochen Maul
László Czakó
Péter Hegyi
Matthias Kraft
Georg Engel
Thomas Kohlmann
Anne Glitsch
Tilman Pickartz
Christoph Budde
Claudia Nitsche
Kirsten Storck
Markus M Lerch
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEJena University Hospital · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DEUniversity of Szeged · HUUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Hospital in Halle · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute pancreatitis is the most common complication of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In spite of continuing research, no pharmacologic agent capable of effectively reducing the incidence of ERCP-induced pancreatitis has found its way into clinical practise. A number of experimental studies suggest that intrapancreatic calcium concentrations play an important role in the initiation of intracellular protease activation, an initiating step in the course of acute pancreatitis. Magnesium can act as a calcium-antagonist and counteracts effects in calcium signalling. It can thereby attenuate the intracellular activation of proteolytic digestive enzymes in the pancreas and reduces the severity of experimental pancreatitis when administered either intravenously or as a food supplement.

methodsWe designed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study to test whether the administration of intravenous magnesium sulphate before and after ERCP reduces the incidence and the severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis. A total of 502 adult patients with a medical indication for ERCP are to be randomized to receive either 4930 mg magnesium sulphate (= 20 mmol magnesium) or placebo 60 min before and 6 hours after ERCP. The incidence of clinical post-ERCP pancreatitis, hyperlipasemia, pain levels, use of analgetics and length of hospital stay will be evaluated.

conclusionsIf magnesium sulphate is found to be effective in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis, this inexpensive agent with limited adverse effects could be used as a routine pharmacological prophylaxis.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN46556454.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdministration, IntravenousAdultCalcium SignalingCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeDouble-Blind MethodHumansIncidenceMagnesium SulfatePancreatitisSeverity of Illness IndexMagnesium Sulfate

Identifiers

PMID23320650
PMCPMC3599317
OpenAlexW2139287425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.