ReviewCurrent gene therapy2013
Technological overview of iPS induction from human adult somatic cells.
Review in Current gene therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comprehensive analysis of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) production and applications.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Birds: Opportunities and Challenges for Science and Agriculture.Veterinary sciences · 2024Review
- The Neuroanatomy of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: In Vitro Models of Subcortical Nuclei in Neurodegenerative Disorders.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- Comparing stem cells, transdifferentiation and brain organoids as tools for psychiatric research.Translational psychiatry · 2024Review
- Application Prospect of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Organoids and Cell Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Review
- Role of Immune Cells in Biliary Repair.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Review
- Potential of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells for Use in Gene Therapy: History, Molecular Bases, and Medical Perspectives.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- Functional Comparison of Blood-Derived Human Neural Progenitor Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Development of a High-Efficacy Reprogramming Method for Generating Human Induced Pluripotent Stem (iPS) Cells from Pathologic and Senescent Somatic Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Large-Scale Production of LGR5-Positive Bipotential Human Liver Stem Cells.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2020Article
- Organoid technology in female reproductive biomedicine.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2020Review
- Advances in Transcription Factors Related to Neuroglial Cell Reprogramming.Translational neuroscience · 2020Article
- Osteopetrotic induced pluripotent stem cells derived from patients with different disease-associated mutations by non-integrating reprogramming methods.Stem cell research & therapy · 2019Article
- An Insight into DNA-free Reprogramming Approaches to Generate Integration-free Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells for Prospective Biomedical Applications.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2019Review
- Concise Review: Molecular Cytogenetics and Quality Control: Clinical Guardians for Pluripotent Stem Cells.Stem cells translational medicine · 2018Review
- Concise Review: Current Status of Three-Dimensional Organoids as Preclinical Models.Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) · 2018Review
- Human stem cell modeling in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1).Experimental neurology · 2018Review
- Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Red Blood Cells and Platelet Concentrates: From Bench to Bedside.Cells · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The unlimited proliferation capacity of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) combined with their pluripotent differentiation potential in various lineages raised great interest in both the scientific community and the public at large with hope for future prospects of regenerative medicine. However, since ESCs are derived from human embryos, their use is associated with significant ethical issues preventing broad studies and therapeutic applications. To get around this bottleneck, Takahashi and Yamanaka have recently achieved the conversion of adult somatic cells into ES-like cells via the forced expression of four transcription factors: Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc. This first demonstration attracted public attention and opened a new field of stem cells research with both cognitive - such as disease modeling - and therapeutic prospects. This pioneer work just received the 2012 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Many methods have been reported since 2006, for the generation of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. Most strategies currently under use are based on gene delivery via gamma-retroviral or lentiviral vectors; some experiments have also been successful using plasmids or transposons- based systems and few with adenovirus. However, most experiments involve integration in the host cell genome with an identified risk for insertional mutagenesis and oncogenic transformation. To circumvent such risks which are deemed incompatible with therapeutic prospects, significant progress has been made with transgene-free reprogramming methods based on e.g.: sendai virus or direct mRNA or protein delivery to achieve conversion of adult cells into iPS. In this review we aim to cover current knowledge relating to both delivery systems and combinations of inducing factors including chemicals which are used to generate human iPS cells. Finally, genetic instability resulting from the reprogramming process is also being considered as a safety bottleneck for future clinical translation and stem cell-therapy prospects based on iPS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.