ArticleStroke research and treatment2012
Hand robotics rehabilitation: feasibility and preliminary results of a robotic treatment in patients with hemiparesis.
Article in Stroke research and treatment, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03207490 (sEMG Based-Rehabilitation of Hand and Fingers After Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
sEMG Based-Rehabilitation of Hand and Fingers After Stroke
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient, carer, and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021Pooled it
- A Systematic Review on Existing Measures for the Subjective Assessment of Rehabilitation and Assistive Robot Devices.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2016Pooled it
- Training modalities in robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation in stroke: a framework for classification based on a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2014Pooled it
- [Paresis of an upper extremity. Action observation and motor imagery in recovery of patients with chronic stroke].Revista de neurologia · 2024Trial
- Quo Vadis, Amadeo Hand Robot? A Randomized Study with a Hand Recovery Predictive Model in Subacute Stroke.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Trial
- Training finger individuation with a mechatronic-virtual reality system leads to improved fine motor control post-stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2014Trial
- Action observation therapy in the subacute phase promotes dexterity recovery in right-hemisphere stroke patients.BioMed research international · 2014Trial
- Combining soft robotics and telerehabilitation for improving motor function after stroke.Wearable technologies · 2024Article
- User Experience Evaluation of Upper Limb Rehabilitation Robots: Implications for Design Optimization: A Pilot Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Commercial device-based hand rehabilitation systems for stroke patients: State of the art and future prospects.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Hand rehabilitation based on the RobHand exoskeleton in stroke patients: A case series study.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2023Article
- A Smart Glove Digital System Promotes Restoration of Upper Limb Motor Function and Enhances Cortical Hemodynamic Changes in Subacute Stroke Patients with Mild to Moderate Weakness: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Robotic devices for paediatric rehabilitation: a review of design features.Biomedical engineering online · 2021Review
- Applications of Smart Textiles in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Research in the Acute Rehabilitation Setting: a Bridge Too Far?Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2019Review
- Self-Calibration Algorithm for a Pressure Sensor with a Real-Time Approach Based on an Artificial Neural Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- A Review of Robotics in Neurorehabilitation: Towards an Automated Process for Upper Limb.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2018Review
- Hand Rehabilitation Robotics on Poststroke Motor Recovery.Behavioural neurology · 2017Review
- A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2014Review
- Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for stroke patients' therapy.BioMed research international · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background. No strongly clinical evidence about the use of hand robot-assisted therapy in stroke patients was demonstrated. This preliminary observer study was aimed at evaluating the efficacy of intensive robot-assisted therapy in hand function recovery, in the early phase after a stroke onset. Methods. Seven acute ischemic stroke patients at their first-ever stroke were enrolled. Treatment was performed using Amadeo robotic system (Tyromotion GmbH Graz, Austria). Each participant received, in addition to inpatients standard rehabilitative treatment, 20 sessions of robotic treatment for 4 consecutive weeks (5 days/week). Each session lasted for 40 minutes. The exercises were carried out as follows: passive modality (5 minutes), passive/plus modality (5 minutes), assisted therapy (10 minutes), and balloon (10 minutes). The following impairment and functional evaluations, Fugl-Meyer Scale (FM), Medical Research Council Scale for Muscle Strength (hand flexor and extensor muscles) (MRC), Motricity Index (MI), and modified Ashworth Scale for wrist and hand muscles (AS), were performed at the beginning (T0), after 10 sessions (T1), and at the end of the treatment (T2). The strength hand flexion and extension performed by Robot were assessed at T0 and T2. The Barthel Index and COMP (performance and satisfaction subscale) were assessed at T0 and T2. Results. Clinical improvements were found in all patients. No dropouts were recorded during the treatment and all subjects fulfilled the protocol. Evidence of a significant improvement was demonstrated by the Friedman test for the MRC (P < 0.0123). Evidence of an improvement was demonstrated for AS, FM, and MI. Conclusions. This original rehabilitation treatment could contribute to increase the hand motor recovery in acute stroke patients. The simplicity of the treatment, the lack of side effects, and the first positive results in acute stroke patients support the recommendations to extend the clinical trial of this treatment, in association with physiotherapy and/or occupational therapy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.