Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23320025›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2012

Banxia baizhu tianma decoction for essential hypertension: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Xingjiang Xiong, Xiaochen Yang, Wei Liu, Bo Feng, Jizheng Ma, Xinliang Du, Pengqian Wang, Fuyong Chu, Jun Li, Jie Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Traditional Chinese Medicine for Essential Hypertension: A Clinical Evidence Map.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Chinese herbal formulas for treating hypertension in traditional Chinese medicine: perspective of modern science.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2013
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Evidence-based chinese medicine for hypertension.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2013
    Article
  20. Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of obesity-related hypertension.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xingjiang XiongDepartment of Cardiology, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beixiange 5, Xicheng District, Beijing 100053, China.
Xiaochen Yang
Wei Liu
Bo Feng
Jizheng Ma
Xinliang Du
Pengqian Wang
Fuyong Chu
Jun Li
Jie Wang
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNGuang’anmen Hospital · CNBeijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives. To assess the current clinical evidence of Banxia Baizhu Tianma Decoction (BBTD) for essential hypertension (EH). Search Strategy. Electronic databases were searched until July 2012. Inclusion Criteria. We included randomized clinical trials testing BBTD against placebo, antihypertensive drugs, or combined with antihypertensive drugs against antihypertensive drugs. Data Extraction and Analyses. Study selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and data analyses were conducted according to Cochrane standards. Results. 16 randomized trials were included. Methodological quality of the included trials was evaluated as generally low. 2 trials compared prescriptions based on BBTD using alone with antihypertensive drugs. Meta-analysis showed no significant effect of modified BBTD compared with captopril in systolic blood pressure (MD: -0.75 (-5.77, 4.27); P = 0.77) and diastolic blood pressure (MD: -0.75 (-2.89, 1.39); P = 0.49). 14 trials compared the combination of BBTD or modified BBTD plus antihypertensive drugs with antihypertensive drugs. Meta-analysis showed there are significant beneficial effect on systolic blood pressure in the combination group compare to the antihypertensive drugs (MD: -4.33 (-8.44, -0.22); P = 0.04). The safety of BBTD is uncertain. Conclusions. There is encouraging evidence of BBTD for lowering SBP, but evidence remains weak. Rigorously designed trials are warranted to confirm these results.

Identifiers

PMID23320025
PMCPMC3541533
OpenAlexW2080184611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.