ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2012
Cervical plexus block versus general anesthesia in carotid surgery: single center experience.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cervical plexus anesthesia versus general anesthesia for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery: A randomized clinical trial.Medicine · 2017Trial
- Risk factors for perioperative stroke, myocardial infarction, and death in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- Anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy - general or loco-regional?Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCarotid endarterectomy may be performed under general (GA) or regional anesthesia (RA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of anesthetic techniques on perioperative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing carotid surgery. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis prospective study included 1098 consecutive patients operated on between 2003 and 2009 (773 underwent cervical plexus block and 325 underwent general anesthesia).
resultsThere were 6 deaths, 3 (0.9%) after GA and 3 (0.4%) after RA (p = 0.272). Neurological complication rates were not significantly different (GA 2.1% vs. RA 1.1%, p = 0.212). Incidence of myocardial infarction was similar (GA 0.31% vs. LA 0.39%, p = 0.840). Shunt placement rate was the same in both groups, 11.1%. Total operating time and carotid clamping time were significantly shorter in RA patients (RA: 92 min vs. GA: 106 min; p < 0.001 and RA: 18 min vs. GA: 19 min; p = 0.040). There was no significant difference in number of reinterventions (RA: 1.0% vs. GA: 0.6%; p = 0.504). Pulmonary complications were common in the GA group (RA: 0 vs. GA 0.9%; p = 0.007). Time to first postoperative analgesic was significantly shorter in the GA group (RA: 226 min vs. GA: 139 min; p < 0.001).
conclusionsType of anesthesia does not affect the outcome of surgical treatment of carotid disease. However, it should be stressed that fewer respiratory complications, later requirement for first postoperative analgesic, and an awake patient who can continue oral therapy early after surgery, give priority to regional techniques of anesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.