Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23319091›Full record

ArticleClinical drug investigation2003

Pharmacodynamics of intravenous and oral midazolam in preterm infants.

Saskia N de Wildt, Gregory L Kearns, Sintha D Sie, Wim C J Hop, John N van den Anker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Midazolam for sedation of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. A CYP3A7 metabolically competent human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocyte-like cell (hHLCDrug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Midazolam-Induced Seizure-Like Activity in Five Neonates: A case series.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2024
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Pharmacogenomics in Children.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Ontogeny of midazolam glucuronidation in preterm infants.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Saskia N de WildtDepartment of Pediatrics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, dewildt@alkg.azr.nl.
Gregory L Kearns
Sintha D Sie
Wim C J Hop
John N van den Anker
Erasmus MC · NLUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacodynamics and safety of midazolam after intravenous infusion or oral administration in preterm infants. METHODS ]PATIENTS WERE RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO INITIALLY RECEIVE MIDAZOLAM 0.1 MG/KG AS A 30-MINUTE INTRAVENOUS INFUSION OR AN ORAL BOLUS DOSE. IF PATIENTS STILL MET THE INCLUSION CRITERIA, THEY THEN RECEIVED MIDAZOLAM VIA THE ALTERNATE ROUTE (AFTER AN INTERVAL OF ≥72 HOURS). PHARMACODYNAMIC MEASUREMENTS CONSISTED OF A COMFORT® SCORE (A PREVIOUSLY VALIDATED SEDATION SCALE FOR PAEDIATRIC PATIENTS) AT BASELINE AND AT 0.5, 1, 2, 4 AND 6 HOURS POSTDOSE. MIDAZOLAM AND 1-OH-MIDAZOLAM CONCENTRATIONS WERE MEASURED AND VITAL SIGNS WERE RECORDED AT ALL PHARMACODYNAMIC MEASUREMENT TIMEPOINTS:

resultsA total of 24 infants were enrolled of whom seven received both intravenous and oral midazolam, 13 received only intravenous midazolam, and four received only oral midazolam. Overall, mean COMFORT® scores decreased (i.e. sedation increased) significantly within 30 minutes after intravenous (p S 0.05) and within 1 hour after oral (p = 0.003) midazolam administration. In 45% of patients the COMFORT® scores decreased little or not at all after midazolam, which was similar after both oral and intravenous administration. The sedative response to midazolam did not differ after intravenous or oral administration. No relationship was found between overall COMFORT® scores or change in COMFORT® score from baseline and midazolam, 1-OH-midazolam, or midazolam plus 1-OH-midazolam concentrations. Diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly after intravenous (approximately 11%) but not after oral midazolam administration. No serious adverse events were reported.

conclusionsMidazolam administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion or oral bolus dose appears to be effective and well tolerated in a small majority of preterm infants. However, a considerable number of neonates do not appear to respond to midazolam. The lack of response may be due to the fact that patients truly experienced therapeutic failure and/or consequent to the inability of the COMFORT® score to adequately reflect sedation uniformly in sick preterm infants.

Identifiers

PMID23319091
OpenAlexW2076631767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.