Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23318662›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in psychiatry2013

Polypharmacy for schizophrenia.

Jacob Ballon, T Scott Stroup

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in psychiatry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. What does schizophrenia teach us about antipsychotics?Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacob BallonColumbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and the New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA.
T Scott Stroup

Funding

Innovative Mentoring and MPH Education in Research and Scientific Excellence In CKM1CA156709 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BEGG, MELISSA D, DAVIDSON, KARINA W. · 2010 to 2010
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS KM1 CA156709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCombining psychotropic medications is common for people diagnosed with schizophrenia facing a variety of clinical circumstances. This review provides an update on evidence regarding the effectiveness of polypharmacy approaches. RECENT

findingsEpidemiology studies have demonstrated that polypharmacy is extremely common, but evidence regarding all polypharmacy approaches for schizophrenia from randomized controlled trials remains scarce. Combinations of antipsychotic medicines are unsupported by evidence. Antidepressants are commonly used to treat depressive symptoms; this logical role for antidepressants has little support from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) but may be associated with lower suicide and all-cause mortality. Insufficient evidence supports the use of benzodiazepines for schizophrenia; possible risks of benzodiazepines, including increased mortality rates revealed in observational studies, warrant caution and further study. SUMMARY: The lack of evidence regarding common treatment strategies exacerbates the tremendous challenge of providing optimal pharmacotherapy for individuals with schizophrenia. Comparative effectiveness research, using observational methods when appropriate and RCTs when possible, is needed to inform clinical practice, use resources wisely and improve outcomes.

Indexed as

PolypharmacyAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsBenzodiazepinesHumansSchizophreniaAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsBenzodiazepines

Identifiers

PMID23318662
PMCPMC4026924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.