ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2013
The Waterlow score for risk assessment in surgical patients.
Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Waterlow score for risk assessment in surgical patients: a systematic review.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2021Pooled it
- Performance of machine learning versus the national early warning score for predicting patient deterioration risk: a single-site study of emergency admissions.BMJ health & care informatics · 2024Article
- The Risk Factors for New-Onset Calf Muscle Venous Thrombosis after Hip Fracture Surgery.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Pre-operative Waterlow score and outcomes after kidney transplantation.BMC nephrology · 2022Observational
- Observational
- Validating a benchmarking tool for audit of early outcomes after operations for head and neck cancer.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2017Article
- Waterlow score as a surrogate marker for predicting adverse outcome in acute pancreatitis.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2016Article
- A prospective cohort study of risk prediction in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2015Article
- Perspective: the challenge of clinical decision-making for drug treatment in older people. The role of multidimensional assessment and prognosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPerioperative scoring systems aim to predict outcome following surgery and are used in preoperative counselling to guide management and to facilitate internal or external audit. The Waterlow score is used prospectively in many UK hospitals to stratify the risk of decubitus ulcer development. The primary aim of this study was to assess the potential value of this existing scoring system in the prediction of mortality and morbidity in a general surgical and vascular cohort.
methodsA total of 101 consecutive moderate to high risk emergency and elective surgical patients were identified through a single institution database. The preoperative Waterlow score and outcome data pertaining to that admission were collected. The discriminatory power of the Waterlow score was compared against that of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade and the Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (P-POSSUM).
resultsThe inpatient mortality rate was 17% and the 30-day morbidity rate was 29%. A statistically significant association was demonstrated between the preoperative Waterlow score and inpatient mortality (p<0.0001) and 30-day morbidity (p=0.0002). Using a threshold Waterlow score of 20 to dichotomise risk, accuracies of 0.84 and 0.76 for prediction of mortality and morbidity were demonstrated. In comparison with P-POSSUM, the preoperative Waterlow score performed well on receiver operating characteristic analysis. With respect to mortality, the area under the curve was 0.81 (0.80-0.85) and for morbidity it was 0.72 (0.69-0.76). The ASA grade achieved a similar level of discrimination.
conclusionsThe Waterlow score is collected routinely by nursing staff in many hospitals and might therefore be an attractive means of predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality. It might also function to stratify perioperative risk for comparison of surgical outcome data. A prospective study comparing these risk prediction scores is required to support these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.