Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23316936›Full record

ReviewMolecular pharmaceutics2013

Physiology of the intrathecal bolus: the leptomeningeal route for macromolecule and particle delivery to CNS.

Mikhail I Papisov, Vasily V Belov, Kimberley S Gannon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intrathecal drug delivery in the era of nanomedicine.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. A phase I/II study of intrathecal idursulfase-IT in children with severe mucopolysaccharidosis II.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Breaking the neuroinflammatory loop with intrathecal dexamethasone in FIRES.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Intrathecal administration of Anti-Nogo-A antibody in macaque monkeys: Pharmacokinetics, tissue penetration and target interaction.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A perspective: neuraxial therapeutics in pain management: now and future.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Brain Targeting Nanomedicines: Pitfalls and Promise.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Drug delivery to the central nervous system.Nature reviews. Materials · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mikhail I PapisovMassachusetts General Hospital, Shriners Hospitals for Children-Boston, and Harvard Medical School, 51 Blossom Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States. papisov@helix.mgh.harvard.edu
Vasily V Belov
Kimberley S Gannon
Massachusetts General Hospital · USNeuroHealing Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USShriners Hospitals for Children - Boston · US

Funding

Macromolecular therapeutics for neoplastic meningitisR21CA152384 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PAPISOV, MIKHAIL I · 2010 to 2011
$366k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA152384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Presently, there are no effective treatments for several diseases involving the CNS, which is protected by the blood-brain, blood-CSF, and blood-arachnoid barriers. Traversing any of these barriers is difficult, especially for macromolecular drugs and particulates. However, there is significant experimental evidence that large molecules can be delivered to the CNS through the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The flux of the interstitial fluid in the CNS parenchyma, as well as the macro flux of CSF in the leptomeningeal space, are believed to be generally opposite to the desirable direction of CNS-targeted drug delivery. On the other hand, the available data suggest that the layer of pia mater lining the CNS surface is not continuous, and the continuity of the leptomeningeal space (LMS) with the perivascular spaces penetrating into the parenchyma provides an unexplored avenue for drug transport deep into the brain via CSF. The published data generally do not support the view that macromolecule transport from the LMS to CNS is hindered by the interstitial and CSF fluxes. The data strongly suggest that leptomeningeal transport depends on the location and volume of the administered bolus and consists of four processes: (i) pulsation-assisted convectional transport of the solutes with CSF, (ii) active "pumping" of CSF into the periarterial spaces, (iii) solute transport from the latter to and within the parenchyma, and (iv) neuronal uptake and axonal transport. The final outcome will depend on the drug molecule behavior in each of these processes, which have not been studied systematically. The data available to date suggest that many macromolecules and nanoparticles can be delivered to CNS in biologically significant amounts (>1% of the administered dose); mechanistic investigation of macromolecule and particle behavior in CSF may result in a significantly more efficient leptomeningeal drug delivery than previously thought.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAnimalsAxonal TransportBiological Transport, ActiveBlood-Brain BarrierBrainCentral Nervous System AgentsCentral Nervous System DiseasesHumansInjections, SpinalMacromolecular SubstancesMeningesModels, AnimalCentral Nervous System AgentsMacromolecular Substances

Identifiers

PMID23316936
PMCPMC3646927
OpenAlexW1974078894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.