Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23316314›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2012

Prevalence of dyslipidemia and lipid goal attainment in statin-treated subjects from 3 data sources: a retrospective analysis.

Peter H Jones, Radhika Nair, Kamlesh M Thakker

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. A Highly Durable RNAi Therapeutic Inhibitor of PCSK9.The New England journal of medicine · 2017
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Lipid-Lowering Drug Therapy: Critical Approach for Implementation in Clinical Practice.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter H JonesBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. jones@bcm.edu
Radhika Nair
Kamlesh M Thakker
Abbott (Canada) · CABaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based randomized clinical trials have shown significant benefit of statin treatment with regard to cardiovascular disease. In anticipation of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel IV guidelines, we wanted to assess the current state of lipid goal attainment in the high-risk secondary prevention population in the United States. The objectives of the study were to estimate the proportion of high-risk patients treated with statin monotherapy who achieved Adult Treatment Panel III-recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals (<100 mg/dL; optional <70 mg/dL) as well as non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals (<130 mg/dL; optional <100 mg/dL). METHODS AND

resultsThis is a cross-sectional, retrospective study of 3 data sources: electronic medical records (2003-September 2010), administrative claims data (2003-2010), and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data (2007-2008). High-risk patients (≥ 18 years of age) were defined as those with a history of coronary heart disease or coronary heart disease risk equivalent who had the latest complete lipid panel measurement and had been treated with statin monotherapy for >90 days at the time of the lipid panel. Cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, and coronary heart disease risk equivalents were defined on the basis of availability, specific to each data source. Across the 3 data sources, 20% to 26% of high-risk patients treated with statin monotherapy for >90 days had LDL-C <70 mg/dL, and 67% to 77% had LDL-C <100 mg/dL. The percentages of those attaining both LDL-C goals and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals were quantitatively smaller (13.5% to 19.0% and 46% to 70%).

conclusionsAcross the 3 data sources, there was consistency in the proportion of high-risk patients treated with statin monotherapy who were at LDL-C goal. A significant number of these statin-treated patients had additional dyslipidemias.

Indexed as

AgedCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLCoronary DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesDyslipidemiasFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMedical RecordsMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsTriglyceridescoronary heart diseasedyslipidemialow-density lipoprotein cholesterolnon–high-density lipoprotein cholesterolstatins

Identifiers

PMID23316314
PMCPMC3540660
OpenAlexW2138438666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.