Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23314980›Full record

Observational studyPituitary2014

Lanreotide extended-release aqueous-gel formulation, injected by patient, partner or healthcare provider in patients with acromegaly in the United States: 1-year data from the SODA registry.

Roberto Salvatori, Whitney W Woodmansee, Mark Molitch, Murray B Gordon, Kathleen G Lomax

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pituitary, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Acromegaly: diagnostic challenges and individualized treatment.Expert review of endocrinology & metabolism · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. New therapeutic agents for acromegaly.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Roberto SalvatoriDivision of Endocrinology, Johns Hopkins University, 1830 East Monument Street #333, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA, salvator@jhmi.edu.
Whitney W Woodmansee
Mark Molitch
Murray B Gordon
Kathleen G Lomax
Allegheny General Hospital · USHarvard University · USIpsen (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR001079 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2013 to 2017
$60.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lanreotide depot (LD; commercial name Somatuline(®) Depot) is an injectable, extended-release formulation of the synthetic somatostatin analog (SSA) lanreotide. In recent clinical trials, LD was found to be suitable for self or partner administration, avoiding the need to travel to a medical facility. The Somatuline(®) Depot for Acromegaly (SODA) study is an ongoing, multicenter, observational study in the US investigating the efficacy, safety, convenience and symptom relief provided by LD in patients with acromegaly. Sub-analyses explore outcomes according to who administered the injection: patient, partner, healthcare provider (HCP) or a combination. Data reported here reflect one year of patient experience. Patients are eligible for inclusion if they have a diagnosis of acromegaly, are treated with LD and can give signed informed consent. Baseline data include patient demographics, previous acromegaly treatment and investigations, GH and IGF-I levels, LD dose and dose adjustment frequency. Symptom frequency, injection pain and treatment convenience are assessed using patient-reported questionnaires. As of 18 April 2012, 166 patients had enrolled in SODA. Most (72 %) achieved normal IGF-I levels after 12 months of LD treatment. Disease control was similar in self or partner injectors and in patients who received injections from their HCP, although self or partner injecting was deemed more convenient. LD was well-tolerated irrespective of who performed the injection. Self injection led to more injection-site reactions, but this did not increase the rate of treatment interruption. Acromegaly symptoms remained stable. Biochemical, safety and convenience data support the clinical validity of injecting LD at home.

Indexed as

AcromegalyAdolescentAdultAgedDelayed-Action PreparationsFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInjections, SubcutaneousInsulin-Like Growth Factor IMaleMiddle AgedPeptides, CyclicSomatostatinDelayed-Action PreparationsInsulin-Like Growth Factor IlanreotidePeptides, CyclicSomatostatin

Identifiers

PMID23314980
PMCPMC3895214
OpenAlexW2116307557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.