Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23314822›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2013

Re-irradiation with and without bevacizumab as salvage therapy for recurrent or progressive high-grade gliomas.

Thomas Hundsberger, Detlef Brügge, Paul M Putora, Patrik Weder, Johannes Weber, Ludwig Plasswilm

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Post-recurrence management of malignant glial brain tumors: therapeutic strategies, evidence and limitations, palliative care, terminal sedation, and end-of-life considerations.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. High-dose salvage re-irradiation for recurrent/progressive adult diffuse glioma: healing or hurting?Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Bevacizumab versus alkylating chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. From imaging to biology of glioblastoma: new clinical oncology perspectives to the problem of local recurrence.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Journal of neuro-oncology · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas HundsbergerDepartment of Neurology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Rorschacherstr. 95, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland. thomas.hundsberger@kssg.ch
Detlef Brügge
Paul M Putora
Patrik Weder
Johannes Weber
Ludwig Plasswilm
Kantonsspital St. Gallen · CHUniversity of St.Gallen · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal treatment for recurrent high-grade gliomas is unknown and a standard of care does not exist. Re-irradiation with concomitant bevacizumab represents an option. Retrospectively, we analyzed a cohort of heavily pretreated patients (n = 14) with relapsing HGGs who underwent re-irradiation with conventional 3D-conformal or intensified modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Ten of them received re-irradiation in combination with bevacizumab. The study population consisted of eight GBMs and six anaplastic gliomas. All patients had previously undergone irradiation for first-line therapy, including seven patients with radiochemotherapy with temozolomide. Patients without contraindications started with two infusions of bevacizumab (10 mg/kg of body weight every other week) prior to re-irradiation and continued through re-irradiation until progression. The median patient age was 45 years with a median Karnofsky performance scale of 70. The median dose of re-irradiation was 41.6 Gy [39-55 Gy]. The median physical cumulative radiation dose was 101.6 Gy [65-110.4 Gy]. The median PFS from re-irradiation was 5.1 months [1.6-17.4] based on clinical and RANO criteria. Median OS from re-irradiation was 9.0 months [6.4-17.8]. We detected radionecrosis due to advanced imaging in one patient. Other toxicities were expected and attributable well known side effects of bevacizumab. This retrospective study provides additional feasibility and safety data of conventional 3D-conformal re-irradiation and IMRT in combination with bevacizumab in relapsing high-grade gliomas.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionFemaleGliomaHumansKarnofsky Performance StatusMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumab

Identifiers

PMID23314822
OpenAlexW1974888707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.