Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23314785›Full record

ArticleBioengineered

Tough nuts to crack: site-directed mutagenesis of bifidobacteria remains a challenge.

Vincenzo F Brancaccio, Daria S Zhurina, Christian U Riedel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineered. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Enhanced editing ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Occurrence and applications of CRISPR-Cas systems in bifidobacteria.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Site-Directed Mutagenesis of Bifidobacterium Strains.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vincenzo F BrancaccioInstitute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Daria S Zhurina
Christian U Riedel
Institute of Microbiology and Biotechnology · MDTechnische Hochschule Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most members of the genus Bifidobacterium are commensals of the human gastrointestinal tract and some strains were shown to exert beneficial effects on their host. Based on these effects and due to their status as GRAS (generally recognized as safe) microorganisms, specific strains of bifidobacteria are marketed as probiotics. Despite their important role in food and dairy industries, the mechanisms responsible for the probiotic effects of bifidobacteria are mostly unknown. Over the last decade, the genomes of a large number of bifidobacteria have been sequenced and analyzed. This has yielded a number of genes and their products that are speculated to contribute to the probiotic effects of bifidobacteria. The gold standard to demonstrate a role for specific genes is the analysis of mutants. At present, only a small number of mutants of bifidobacteria have been generated by targeted mutagenesis. This is owed to the genetic inaccessibility of most strains and a lack of appropriate molecular tools. Successful generation of mutants of bifidobacteria was achieved by various methods including classical suicide vector strategies, increase of transformation efficiencies by methylation of plasmids and the use of temperature-sensitive vectors. In this commentary, we will describe the methods successfully used for mutagenesis of bifidobacteria and discuss their advantages and limitations.

Indexed as

BifidobacteriumGenes, BacterialMutagenesis, Site-DirectedProbioticsbifidobacteriadirected mutagenesisrecombinationrestriction-modification systemstemperature-sensitive replicon

Identifiers

PMID23314785
PMCPMC3728189
OpenAlexW1981573157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.