ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2013
Microalbuminuria predicts silent myocardial ischaemia in type 2 diabetes patients.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Precision prognostics for cardiovascular disease in Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Communications medicine · 2024Article
- Albuminuria: An Underappreciated Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Review
- Chronic kidney disease is a key predictive factor for potential myocardial ischaemia and poor prognosis in asymptomatic patients with diabetes mellitus.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Significance of Microalbuminuria in Predicting Silent Myocardial Ischemia in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Using Myocardial Perfusion ImagingMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2019Article
- The First Harmonic of Radial Pulse as an Early Predictor of Silent Coronary Artery Disease and Adverse Cardiac Events in Type 2 Diabetic Patients.Cardiology research and practice · 2018Article
- Radial Pulse Spectrum Analysis as Risk Markers to Improve the Risk Stratification of Silent Myocardial Ischemia in Type 2 Diabetic Patients.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2018Article
- Evaluation of Silent Myocardial Ischemia with Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography in Asymptomatic Subjects with Diabetes and Pre-Diabetes.Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2016Article
- Microalbuminuria (Moderate Albumin Excretion) and its relationship with Silent myocardial ischemia in treatment naïve type II diabetic patients.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
- Identification of coronary heart disease in asymptomatic individuals with diabetes mellitus: to screen or not to screen.Colombia medica (Cali, Colombia)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMyocardial ischaemia is frequently silent in patients with type 2 diabetes. Although it has been proposed as a potential screening tool, the role of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (MPS) has recently been questioned, due to the low prevalence of positive scans and the low rate of cardiac events. The aim of this study was to assess if pretest clinical variables can identify a subgroup of asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes at risk of silent myocardial ischaemia and a subsequent poor outcome
methodsThis prospective study included 77 patients (50 men, mean age 63 ± 9 years) with type 2 diabetes and no known coronary artery disease (CAD) or angina pectoris who underwent gated MPS to screen for CAD between March 2006 and October 2008. MPS images were interpreted using a semiquantitative visual 20-segment model to define summed stress, rest and difference scores. Ischaemia was defined as a sum difference score (SDS) ≥2. Patients were followed-up (median 4.1 years, range 0.8 - 6.1 years) and cardiac hard events (cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction) were recorded.
resultsSilent ischaemia was detected in 25 of the 77 patients (32 %). Specifically, 10 patients (13 %) had mild ischaemia (SDS 2 to ≤4) and 15 patients (19 %) had severe ischaemia (SDS >4). In univariate binary logistic analysis, microalbuminuria was the only significant predictor of silent ischaemia on MPS (odds ratio 4.42, 95 % CI 1.27 - 15.40; P = 0.019). The overall accuracy of microalbuminuria for predicting silent ischaemia was 71.4 % and was 89.6 % for predicting severe ischaemia. Kaplan-Meier curves showed no significant group differences in 5-year cardiac event-free survival between patients with and those without microalbuminuria, or between patients with SDS ≥2 and those with SDS <2. In contrast, 5-year event-free survival was significantly lower in patients with SDS >4 than in patients with SDS ≤4: 55.6 % (95 % CI 39.0 - 72.2 %) vs. 94.5 % (95 % CI: 91.4 - 97.6 %), respectively (Breslow test, chi-square 20.9, P < 0.001). Median cardiac event-free survival was not observed in the whole group, while the 25th percentile of cardiac event-free survival was reached only in patients with SDS >4 (2.3 years). In univariate Cox regression analysis, SDS >4 predicted cardiac event-free survival (hazard ratio 12.87, 95 % CI 2.86 - 27.98; P = 0.001), while SDS ≥2 did not (hazard ratio 2.78, 95 % CI 0.62 - 12.46, P = 0.16).
conclusionIn this group of patients with type 2 diabetes, microalbuminuria was the only predictor of silent ischaemia on MPS. Assessment of microalbuminuria should be routinely considered among the first risk stratification steps for CAD in patients with type 2 diabetes, even though severe ischaemia on MPS is a major predictor of cardiac event-free survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.