Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23313899›Full record

ArticleExperimental neurology2013

Adaptive control of epileptiform excitability in an in vitro model of limbic seizures.

Gabriella Panuccio, Arthur Guez, Robert Vincent, Massimo Avoli, Joelle Pineau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Big data in status epilepticus.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2019
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Future of seizure prediction and intervention: closing the loop.Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabriella PanuccioMontreal Neurological Institute, Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, McGill University, 3801 University Street, Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 2B4.
Arthur Guez
Robert Vincent
Massimo Avoli
Joelle Pineau
McGill University · CAMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CAOxford Centre for Computational Neuroscience · GB

Funding

Methodology for Adaptive Treatment Strategies (RMI)R21DA019800 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MURPHY, SUSAN A · 2004 to 2005
$224k
CIHR 8109-6CIHR 97907-1CIHR MOP 8109CIHR MOP 97907NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA019800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising tool for treating drug-resistant epileptic patients. Currently, the most common approach is fixed-frequency stimulation (periodic pacing) by means of stimulating devices that operate under open-loop control. However, a drawback of this DBS strategy is the impossibility of tailoring a personalized treatment, which also limits the optimization of the stimulating apparatus. Here, we propose a novel DBS methodology based on a closed-loop control strategy, developed by exploiting statistical machine learning techniques, in which stimulation parameters are adapted to the current neural activity thus allowing for seizure suppression that is fine-tuned on the individual scale (adaptive stimulation). By means of field potential recording from adult rat hippocampus-entorhinal cortex (EC) slices treated with the convulsant drug 4-aminopyridine we determined the effectiveness of this approach compared to low-frequency periodic pacing, and found that the closed-loop stimulation strategy: (i) has similar efficacy as low-frequency periodic pacing in suppressing ictal-like events but (ii) is more efficient than periodic pacing in that it requires less electrical pulses. We also provide evidence that the closed-loop stimulation strategy can alternatively be employed to tune the frequency of a periodic pacing strategy. Our findings indicate that the adaptive stimulation strategy may represent a novel, promising approach to DBS for individually-tailored epilepsy treatment.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBiophysicsElectric StimulationEvoked PotentialsIn Vitro TechniquesLimbic SystemNeural PathwaysRatsRats, Sprague-Dawley

Identifiers

PMID23313899
PMCPMC4891193
OpenAlexW1976443859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.