Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23313874›Full record

ArticleBrain research2013

Age-related differences in enhancement and suppression of neural activity underlying selective attention in matched young and old adults.

A E Haring, T Y Zhuravleva, B R Alperin, D M Rentz, P J Holcomb, K R Daffner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A E HaringCenter for Brain/Mind Medicine, Division of Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
T Y Zhuravleva
B R Alperin
D M Rentz
P J Holcomb
K R Daffner

Funding

ERP Investigations of Novelty Processing in Different Patterns of Cognitive AgingR01AG017935 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI DAFFNER, KIRK R · 2002 to 2012
$4.5M
The Neuro-cognition of Word ComprehensionR37HD025889 · NICHD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI HOLCOMB, PHILLIP J · 2011 to 2020
$3.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017935NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD025889PHS HHS R01AGO17935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective attention reflects the top-down control of sensory processing that is mediated by enhancement or inhibition of neural activity. ERPs were used to investigate age-related differences in neural activity in an experiment examining selective attention to color under Attend and Ignore conditions, as well as under a Neutral condition in which color was task-irrelevant. We sought to determine whether differences in neural activity between old and young adult subjects were due to differences in age rather than executive capacity. Old subjects were matched to two groups of young subjects on the basis of neuropsychological test performance: one using age-appropriate norms and the other using test scores not adjusted for age. We found that old and young subject groups did not differ in the overall modulation of selective attention between Attend and Ignore conditions, as indexed by the size of the anterior Selection Positivity. However, in contrast to either young adult group, old subjects did not exhibit reduced neural activity under the Ignore relative to Neutral condition, but showed enhanced activity under the Attend condition. The onset and peak of the Selection Positivity occurred later for old than young subjects. In summary, older adults execute selective attention less efficiently than matched younger subjects, with slowed processing and failed suppression under Ignore. Increased enhancement under Attend may serve as a compensatory mechanism.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsAttentionBrainElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23313874
PMCPMC3570693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.