Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23313402›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2013

Differences in the neuronal response to food in obesity-resistant as compared to obesity-prone individuals.

Marc-Andre Cornier, Kristina L McFadden, Elizabeth A Thomas, Jamie L Bechtell, Lindsay S Eichman, Daniel H Bessesen, Jason R Tregellas

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Changes in brain activity after weight loss.Obesity science & practice · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marc-Andre CornierDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. marc.cornier@ucdenver.edu
Kristina L McFadden
Elizabeth A Thomas
Jamie L Bechtell
Lindsay S Eichman
Daniel H Bessesen
Jason R Tregellas
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USDenver VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001082 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$48.0M
PILOT STUDY--SUBSTRATE METABOLISM IN EXTREMELY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT INFANTSP30DK048520 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BRYAN C BERGMAN · 1995 to 2026
$32.6M
Colorado Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UL1)UL1TR000154 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2012 to 2013
$20.4M
The Effects of Enerty Imbalance on Food Intake BehaviorsR01DK072174 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI CORNIER, MARC-ANDRE · 2007 to 2011
$1.3M
The Effects of Overfeeding on OP and OR WomenR01DK062874 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BESSESEN, DANIEL HOLLAND · 2003 to 2007
$1.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000154NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001082NIDDK NIH HHS DK48520NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK048520NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK062874NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK072174NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK072174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite living in an obesogenic environment, some individuals maintain a thin phenotype compared to the majority who are at risk for weight gain and obesity. Understanding how these different phenotypes regulate energy intake is critical. The objective of this study was to examine the differences in neuronal response to visual food cues in adults recruited as either obesity-resistant (OR) or obesity-prone (OP) based on self-identification, BMI, and personal/family weight history. 25 OR and 28 OP individuals were studied after 4 days of eucaloric energy intake. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was performed in the fasted and acute fed states (30 min after a test meal) while subjects viewed images of foods of high hedonic value and neutral non-food objects. Measures of appetite using visual analog scales were performed before and every 30 min after the test meal for 3 h. In the fasted state, food as compared to nonfood images elicited significant response in the insula, somatosensory cortex, parietal cortex, and visual cortex in both OR and OP. The acute fed state resulted in significant attenuation of these and other brain areas in the OR but not OP individuals. Furthermore, OP as compared to OR individuals showed greater activation of medial and anterior prefrontal cortex (PFC) in response to the test meal. Adjusting for fat mass did not impact these results. Attenuation of insula/PFC response to food images in the fed state was associated with greater reductions in hunger. These findings suggest that individuals prone to weight gain and obesity have altered neuronal responses to food cues in brain regions known to be important in energy intake regulation. These altered responses may represent an important mechanism contributing to excess energy intake and risk for obesity.

Indexed as

CuesFoodAdultAppetiteCerebral CortexDietEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansHungerImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleObesityPrefrontal CortexSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID23313402
PMCPMC3615115
OpenAlexW2046525492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.