Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23313399›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of antimicrobial agents2013

Characterisation and clinical features of Enterobacter cloacae bloodstream infections occurring at a tertiary care university hospital in Switzerland: is cefepime adequate therapy?

Markus Hilty, Parham Sendi, Salome N Seiffert, Sara Droz, Vincent Perreten, Andrea M Hujer, Robert A Bonomo, Kathrin Mühlemann, Andrea Endimiani

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of antimicrobial agents, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Class C β-Lactamases: Molecular Characteristics.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Emergence of Resistance inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Primer on AmpC β-Lactamases: Necessary Knowledge for an Increasingly Multidrug-resistant World.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. GradualFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Markus HiltyInstitute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Friedbühlstrasse 51, Get rid of Postfach 61, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Parham Sendi
Salome N Seiffert
Sara Droz
Vincent Perreten
Andrea M Hujer
Robert A Bonomo
Kathrin Mühlemann
Andrea Endimiani
University of Bern · CHUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity School · US

Funding

Understanding ceftazidime resistance in SHV B-LactamasesR01AI063517 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BONOMO, ROBERT A. · 2005 to 2023
$4.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI063517NIAID NIH HHS R01AI063517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite many years of clinical experience with cefepime, data regarding the outcome of patients suffering from bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to Enterobacter cloacae (Ecl) are scarce. To address the gap in our knowledge, 57 Ecl responsible for 51 BSIs were analysed implementing phenotypic and molecular methods (microarrays, PCRs for bla and other genes, rep-PCR to analyse clonality). Only two E. cloacae (3.5%) were ESBL-producers, whereas 34 (59.6%) and 18 (31.6%) possessed inducible (Ind-Ecl) or derepressed (Der-Ecl) AmpC enzymes, respectively. All isolates were susceptible to imipenem, meropenem, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin. Der-Ecl were highly resistant to ceftazidime and piperacillin/tazobactam (both MIC₉₀≥256 μg/mL), whereas cefepime retained its activity (MIC₉₀ of 3 μg/mL). rep-PCR indicated that the isolates were sporadic, but Ecl collected from the same patients were indistinguishable. In particular, three BSIs initially due to Ind-Ecl evolved (under ceftriaxone or piperacillin/tazobactam treatment) into Der-Ecl because of mutations or a deletion in ampD or insertion of IS4321 in the promoter. These last two mechanisms have never been described in Ecl. Mortality was higher for BSIs due to Der-Ecl than Ind-Ecl (3.8% vs. 29.4%; P=0.028) and was associated with the Charlson co-morbidity index (P=0.046). Using the following directed treatments, patients with BSI showed a favourable treatment outcome: cefepime (16/18; 88.9%); carbapenems (12/13; 92.3%); ceftriaxone (4/7; 57.1%); piperacillin/tazobactam (5/7; 71.4%); and ciprofloxacin (6/6; 100%). Cefepime represents a safe therapeutic option and an alternative to carbapenems to treat BSIs due to Ecl when the prevalence of ESBL-producers is low.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiabeta-LactamasesCefepimeCephalosporinsDrug Therapy, CombinationEnterobacter cloacaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsFemaleGenotypeHospitals, UniversityHumansInfectionsMaleAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCefepimeCephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID23313399
PMCPMC4018813
OpenAlexW2072321013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.