Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23312957›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2013

Clinical assessment of the 1/3 radius using a new desktop ultrasonic bone densitometer.

Emily M Stein, Fernando Rosete, Polly Young, Mafo Kamanda-Kosseh, Donald J McMahon, Gangming Luo, Jonathan J Kaufman, Elizabeth Shane, Robert S Siffert

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emily M SteinDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Fernando Rosete
Polly Young
Mafo Kamanda-Kosseh
Donald J McMahon
Gangming Luo
Jonathan J Kaufman
Elizabeth Shane
Robert S Siffert
Columbia University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USNew York University · US

Funding

Idiopathic Osteoporosis in Premenopausal WomenK24AR052665 · NIAMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHANE, ELIZABETH J · 2005 to 2014
$1.8M
A NEW SYSTEM FOR ULTRASONIC ASSESSMENT OF THE CALCANEUSR44AR064113 · NIAMS · CYBERLOGIC, INC. · PI KAUFMAN, JONATHAN · 2013 to 2016
$1.5M
Ultrasonic Assessment of the ForearmR44AR054307 · NIAMS · CYBERLOGIC, INC. · PI KAUFMAN, JONATHAN · 2007 to 2008
$976k
A New System for Ultrasonic Bone AssessmentR44AR045150 · NIAMS · CYBERLOGIC, INC. · PI KAUFMAN, JONATHAN · 2002 to 2003
$861k
Ultrasonic Assessment of the ForearmR44AG036879 · NIA · CYBERLOGIC, INC. · PI KAUFMAN, JONATHAN · 2010 to 2010
$858k
SIMPLIFIED SYSTEM FOR ULTRASONIC BONE ASSESSMENTR43AR045150 · NIAMS · CYBERLOGIC, INC. · PI KAUFMAN, JONATHAN · 1999 to 1999
–
NIAMS NIH HHS AR45150NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR052665NIAMS NIH HHS R44 AR045150NIAMS NIH HHS R44 AR054307NIAMS NIH HHS R44 AR064113NIA NIH HHS AG036879NIA NIH HHS R44 AG036879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the capability of a novel ultrasound device to clinically estimate bone mineral density (BMD) at the 1/3 radius. The device rests on a desktop and is portable, and permits real-time evaluation of the radial BMD. The device measures two net time delay (NTD) parameters, NTD(DW) and NTD(CW). NTD(DW) is defined as the difference between the transit time of an ultrasound pulse to travel through soft-tissue, cortex and medullary cavity, and the transit time through soft tissue only of equal overall distance. NTD(CW) is defined as the difference between the transit time of an ultrasound pulse to travel through soft-tissue and cortex only, and the transit time through soft tissue only again of equal overall distance. The square root of the product of these two parameters is a measure of the radial BMD at the 1/3 location as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). A clinical IRB-approved study measured ultrasonically 60 adults at the 1/3 radius. BMD was also measured at the same anatomic site and time using DXA. A linear regression using NTD produced a linear correlation coefficient of 0.93 (p < 0.001). These results are consistent with previously reported simulation and in vitro studies. In conclusion, although X-ray methods are effective in bone mass assessment, osteoporosis remains one of the largest undiagnosed and under-diagnosed diseases in the world today. The research described here should enable significant expansion of diagnosis and monitoring of osteoporosis through a desktop device that ultrasonically assesses bone mass at the 1/3 radius.

Indexed as

Bone DensityAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiusReproducibility of ResultsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedUltrasonographyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23312957
PMCPMC3570600
OpenAlexW2023035618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.