Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23312521›Full record

ArticleNeuron2013

Fast silencing reveals a lost role for reciprocal inhibition in locomotion.

Peter R Moult, Glen A Cottrell, Wen-Chang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The CPGs for Limbed Locomotion-Facts and Fiction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Behavioral Role of the Reciprocal Inhibition between a Pair of Mauthner Cells during Fast Escapes in Zebrafish.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Phasic inhibition as a mechanism for generation of rapid respiratory rhythms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  16. Delineating the Diversity of Spinal Interneurons in Locomotor Circuits.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter R MoultSchool of Biology, University of St. Andrews, Bute Building, St. Andrews KY16 9TS, UK.
Glen A Cottrell
Wen-Chang Li

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alternating contractions of antagonistic muscle groups during locomotion are generated by spinal "half-center" networks coupled in antiphase by reciprocal inhibition. It is widely thought that reciprocal inhibition only coordinates the activity of these muscles. We have devised two methods to rapidly and selectively silence neurons on just one side of Xenopus tadpole spinal cord and hindbrain, which generate swimming rhythms. Silencing activity on one side led to rapid cessation of activity on the other side. Analyses reveal that this resulted from the depression of reciprocal inhibition connecting the two sides. Although critical neurons in intact tadpoles are capable of pacemaker firing individually, an effect that could support motor rhythms without inhibition, the swimming network itself requires ~23 min to regain rhythmic activity after blocking inhibition pharmacologically, implying some homeostatic changes. We conclude therefore that reciprocal inhibition is critical for the generation of normal locomotor rhythm.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectric StimulationGene SilencingHumansLocomotionNeural InhibitionPeriodicitySwimmingXenopus laevis

Identifiers

PMID23312521
PMCPMC3542422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.