Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23312109›Full record

ArticleThe International journal on drug policy2013

Interdisciplinary mixed methods research with structurally vulnerable populations: case studies of injection drug users in San Francisco.

Andrea M Lopez, Philippe Bourgois, Lynn D Wenger, Jennifer Lorvick, Alexis N Martinez, Alex H Kral

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal on drug policy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea M LopezUrban Health Program, RTI International, San Francisco Regional Office, San Francisco, CA 94104, USA. alopez@rti.org
Philippe Bourgois
Lynn D Wenger
Jennifer Lorvick
Alexis N Martinez
Alex H Kral

Funding

The Logics for HIV Risk among Street-Based Heroin InjectorsR01DA010164 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BRANAS, CHARLES C. · 1996 to 2014
$4.9M
Correlates of Sexual Risk for HIV/STI Among Women Who Use MethamphetamineR01DA021100 · NIDA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI KRAL, ALEXANDER H · 2006 to 2008
$1.6M
Assessing Patterns of HIV Risk Among IDUs in Neighborhood Environments over TimeR01DA023377 · NIDA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI KRAL, ALEXANDER H · 2009 to 2011
$1.4M
Qualitative Exploration of Low-Frequency Heroin Injectors Not in Drug TreatmentR01DA021627 · NIDA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI KRAL, ALEXANDER H · 2007 to 2009
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS 1R01DA021100NIDA NIH HHS 5R01DA010164NIDA NIH HHS 5R01DA021627NIDA NIH HHS 5R01DA023377NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA010164NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA021100NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA021627NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research with injection drug users (IDUs) benefits from interdisciplinary theoretical and methodological innovation because drug use is illegal, socially sanctioned and often hidden. Despite the increasing visibility of interdisciplinary, mixed methods research projects with IDUs, qualitative components are often subordinated to quantitative approaches and page restrictions in top addiction journals limit detailed reports of complex data collection and analysis logistics, thus minimizing the fuller scientific potential of genuine mixed methods. We present the methodological logistics and conceptual approaches of four mixed-methods research projects that our interdisciplinary team conducted in San Francisco with IDUs over the past two decades. These projects include combinations of participant-observation ethnography, in-depth qualitative interviewing, epidemiological surveys, photo-documentation, and geographic mapping. We adapted Greene et al.'s framework for combining methods in a single research project through: data triangulation, methodological complementarity, methodological initiation, and methodological expansion. We argue that: (1) flexible and self-reflexive methodological procedures allowed us to seize strategic opportunities to document unexpected and sometimes contradictory findings as they emerged to generate new research questions, (2) iteratively mixing methods increased the scope, reliability, and generalizability of our data, and (3) interdisciplinary collaboration contributed to a scientific "value added" that allowed for more robust theoretical and practical findings about drug use and risk-taking.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary StudiesData CollectionDrug UsersHumansIll-Housed PersonsSan FranciscoSubstance Abuse, IntravenousVulnerable Populations

Identifiers

PMID23312109
PMCPMC3954115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.