Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23312067›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2013

Alternative cytoskeletal landscapes: cytoskeletal novelty and evolution in basal excavate protists.

Scott C Dawson, Alexander R Paredez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Microtubule organelles in Giardia.Advances in parasitology · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Myosin-independent cytokinesis inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Scott C DawsonDepartment of Microbiology, One Shields Avenue, UC Davis, Davis, CA 95616, United States. scdawson@ucdavis.edu
Alexander R Paredez
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Molecular mechanisms of attachment by the ventral disc in GiardiaR01AI077571 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI DAWSON, SCOTT C · 2009 to 2023
$5.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI077571
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial eukaryotes encompass the majority of eukaryotic evolutionary and cytoskeletal diversity. The cytoskeletal complexity observed in multicellular organisms appears to be an expansion of components present in genomes of diverse microbial eukaryotes such as the basal lineage of flagellates, the Excavata. Excavate protists have complex and diverse cytoskeletal architectures and life cycles-essentially alternative cytoskeletal 'landscapes'-yet still possess conserved microtubule-associated and actin-associated proteins. Comparative genomic analyses have revealed that a subset of excavates, however, lack many canonical actin-binding proteins central to actin cytoskeleton function in other eukaryotes. Overall, excavates possess numerous uncharacterized and 'hypothetical' genes, and may represent an undiscovered reservoir of novel cytoskeletal genes and cytoskeletal mechanisms. The continued development of molecular genetic tools in these complex microbial eukaryotes will undoubtedly contribute to our overall understanding of cytoskeletal diversity and evolution.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionActinsAnimalsCytoskeletonEukaryotaGenomeHumansMicrotubulesPhylogenyProteinsSpecies SpecificityActinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID23312067
PMCPMC4927265
OpenAlexW2116547448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.