Single-stranded nucleic acid recognition: is there a code after all?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Recent computational developments on CLIP-seq data analysis and microRNA targeting implications.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2018
   Review
2. Structural basis for -10 promoter element melting by environmentally induced sigma factors.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2014
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Nonspecific recognition is achieved in Pot1pC through the use of multiple binding modes.2013

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract