Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23310961›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of preventive cardiology2012

Prevention of cardiovascular disease guided by total risk estimations--challenges and opportunities for practical implementation: highlights of a CardioVascular Clinical Trialists (CVCT) Workshop of the ESC Working Group on CardioVascular Pharmacology and Drug Therapy.

Faiez Zannad, Jean Dallongeville, Robert J Macfadyen, Luis M Ruilope, Lars Wilhelmsen, Guy De Backer, Ian Graham, Matthias Lorenz, Giuseppe Mancia, David A Morrow and 3 more

Abstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of preventive cardiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Statins for primary cardiovascular prevention in the elderly.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2015
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Statins in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2013 · on this map
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Faiez ZannadCentre d'investigation Clinique, Institut Lorrain du Coeuret des Vaisseaux, CHU Brabois, Vandoeuvre, France. f.zannad@chu-nancy.fr
Jean Dallongeville
Robert J Macfadyen
Luis M Ruilope
Lars Wilhelmsen
Guy De Backer
Ian Graham
Matthias Lorenz
Giuseppe Mancia
David A Morrow
Zeljko Reiner
Wolfgang Koenig
ESC Working Group on CardioVascular Pharmacology and Drug Therapy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a summary of the potential practical and economic barriers to implementation of primary prevention of cardiovascular disease guided by total cardiovascular risk estimations in the general population. It also reviews various possible solutions to overcome these barriers. The report is based on discussion among experts in the area at a special CardioVascular Clinical Trialists workshop organized by the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Drug Therapy that took place in September 2009. It includes a review of the evidence in favour of the "treat-to-target" paradigm, as well as potential difficulties with this approach, including the multiple pathological processes present in high-risk patients that may not be adequately addressed by this strategy. The risk-guided therapy approach requires careful definitions of cardiovascular risk and consideration of clinical endpoints as well as the differences between trial and "real-world" populations. Cost-effectiveness presents another issue in scenarios of finite healthcare resources, as does the difficulty of documenting guideline uptake and effectiveness in the primary care setting, where early modification of risk factors may be more beneficial than later attempts to manage established disease. The key to guideline implementation is to improve the quality of risk assessment and demonstrate the association between risk factors, intervention, and reduced event rates. In the future, this may be made possible by means of automated data entry and various other measures. In conclusion, opportunities exist to increase guideline implementation in the primary care setting, with potential benefits for both the general population and healthcare resources.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesPatient SelectionPrimary PreventionCardiovascular DiseasesCost-Benefit AnalysisGuideline AdherenceHealth Care CostsHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicPrimary Health CarePrognosisQuality ImprovementRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID23310961
PMCPMC3573669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.