ArticlePloS one2013
Species detection and identification in sexual organisms using population genetic theory and DNA sequences.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing Species Delimitation inMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Genomic epidemiology ofmBio · 2025Article
- High Genetic Diversity of Histoplasma in the Amazon Basin, 2006-2017.Emerging infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Description of a novelPeerJ · 2025Article
- Article
- Phenotypic characterization of cryptic species in the fungal pathogenbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- A Measure of the DNA Barcode Gap for Applied and Basic Research.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Article
- New Insights Into the Genetic Variability ofHelminthologia · 2022Article
- Ecological and Morphological Differentiation Among COI Haplotype Groups in the Plant Parasitic Nematode SpeciesJournal of nematology · 2022Article
- An Indian lineage of Histoplasma with strong signatures of differentiation and selection.Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B · 2022Article
- Some Examples of the Use of Molecular Markers for Needs of Basic Biology and Modern Society.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Review
- Article
- The probability of reciprocal monophyly of gene lineages in three and four species.Theoretical population biology · 2019Article
- Fungal species boundaries in the genomics era.Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B · 2019Review
- Integrative taxonomy of a new Redudasys species (Gastrotricha: Macrodasyida) sheds light on the invasion of fresh water habitats by macrodasyids.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- New record of the fish leechBiologia · 2018Article
- Article
- Article
- A novel genus and cryptic species harboured within the monotypic freshwater crayfish genusPeerJ · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phylogenetic trees of DNA sequences of a group of specimens may include clades of two kinds: those produced by stochastic processes (random genetic drift) within a species, and clades that represent different species. The ratio of the mean pairwise sequence difference between a pair of clades (K) to the mean pairwise sequence difference within a clade (θ) can be used to determine whether the clades are samples from different species (K/θ ≥ 4) or the same species (K/θ<4) with probability ≥ 0.95. Previously I applied this criterion to delimit species of asexual organisms. Here I use data from the literature to show how it can also be applied to delimit sexual species using four groups of sexual organisms as examples: ravens, spotted leopards, sea butterflies, and liverworts. Mitochondrial or chloroplast genes are used because these segregate earlier during speciation than most nuclear genes and hence detect earlier stages of speciation. In several cases the K/θ ratio was greater than 4, confirming the original authors' intuition that the clades were sufficiently different to be assigned to different species. But the K/θ ratio split each of two liverwort species into two evolutionary species, and showed that support for the distinction between the common and Chihuahuan raven species is weak. I also discuss some possible sources of error in using the K/θ ratio; the most significant one would be cases where males migrate between different populations but females do not, making the use of maternally inherited organelle genes problematic. The K/θ ratio must be used with some caution, like all other methods for species delimitation. Nevertheless, it is a simple theory-based quantitative method for using DNA sequences to make rigorous decisions about species delimitation in sexual as well as asexual eukaryotes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.