Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23308032›Full record

ArticleResearch on aging2010

Population Group Differences in Cognitive Functioning in a National Sample of Israelis Fifty Years and Older.

Liat Ayalon, Jeremia Heinik, Howard Litwin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research on aging, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Liat Ayalon
Jeremia Heinik
Howard Litwin
Bar-Ilan University · ILHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center · IL

Funding

Longitudinal Extension of SHARE-Israel Baseline DataR01AG031729 · NIA · HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM · PI LITWIN, HOWARD · 2010 to 2018
$2.2M
DEVELOPING AN ISRAELI VERSION OF THE HRS/SHARE PROJECTR21AG025169 · NIA · HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM · PI LITWIN, HOWARD · 2004 to 2006
$297k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG031729NIA NIH HHS R21 AG025169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study evaluates population group differences of Israelis 50 years and older in cognitive functioning. Groups were defined based on year of arrival and preferred language (e.g., veteran Jewish Israelis- n= 1,974; new immigrants from the former Soviet Union- n=187; and Arab Israelis- n=331). Using a cross-sectional analysis of the first wave of SHARE-Israel, we evaluate a representative sample of Israelis over the age of 50 stratified by population group. Cognitive screens assessed include time orientation, arithmetic, verbal learning, verbal recall, word fluency and subjective reading and writing abilities. To evaluate population group differences, we conducted multivariate analyses of each of the cognitive domains, controlling for age, gender, education, household income, and ever smoking. Relative to veteran Jewish Israelis, new immigrants from the former Soviet Unions were more likely to rate their reading ability as impaired (OR=2.47, 95% CI: 1.32-4.60). In addition, there was a significant interaction between population group and education on the arithmetic task (OR=.69, 95% CI: .58-.83). New immigrants from the former Soviet Union were less impaired than the other two groups especially at lower levels of education. New immigrants were more impaired on the verbal learning task (OR=2.65, 95% CI: 1.38-5.07). On the other hand, relative to veteran Israeli-Jews, Israeli-Arabs were significantly less likely to have impaired performance on the verbal recall task (OR=.31, 95% CI=.16-.60). The results demonstrate that overall, new immigrant from the Former Soviet Union exhibit greater difficulties on the verbal tasks, but not on the arithmetic task. The findings from the current study are somewhat in contrast with the international literature which tends to show that the majority culture outperforms relative to ethnic minorities.

Identifiers

PMID23308032
PMCPMC3539406
OpenAlexW1989434110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.