Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23307778›Full record

ReviewProtein & cell2013

Innate immune responses to DNA viruses.

Ying Nie, Yan-Yi Wang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Protein & cell, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Early approval of COVID-19 vaccines: Pros and cons.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Immune Ecosystem of Virus-Infected Host Tissues.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  13. The Regulation of cGAS.Virologica Sinica · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Caspases control antiviral innate immunity.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2017
    Review
  16. DNA vaccines for prostate cancer.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ying NieWuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Yan-Yi Wang
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The innate immune system acts as the first line of defense against pathogens, which is also essential for initiation of adaptive immunity. Innate immune responses are initiated by pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs), which recognize conserved molecular structures of pathogens called pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). The infection of virus triggers a series of signaling events leading to transcriptional induction of type I interferons (IFNs) and proinflammatory cytokines. In recent years, the mechanisms of viral RNA recognition and RNA virus-triggered signaling pathways have been well studied. However, it remains unclear on how DNA virus infection is sensed by host cells and triggers the host antiviral defense. Although ten potential viral DNA sensors have been reported, none of them is validated as a generally used sensor for distinct DNA viruses in divergent cell types and animals. Here, we provide a summary and perspective on recent advances in innate immune responses to DNA viruses.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateAnimalsDNA VirusesHumansProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID23307778
PMCPMC4875446
OpenAlexW1975450245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.