ReviewTechniques in coloproctology2013
Robotic total mesorectal excision: operative technique and review of the literature.
Review in Techniques in coloproctology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Robotics Total Mesorectal Excision Up To the Minute.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2020Review
- Developing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program: understanding institutional and individual learning curves.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Article
- [Robot-assisted rectal surgery: hype or progress?].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2016Review
- Dealing with robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: Current status and perspectives.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Review
- SAGES TAVAC safety and effectiveness analysis: da Vinci ® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA).Surgical endoscopy · 2015Article
- The Role of Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Overcoming Technical Challenges in Laparoscopic Surgery by Advanced Techniques.Journal of Korean medical science · 2015Review
- Single stage robotic total mesorectal excision-a stepwise approach.Journal of visualized surgery · 2015Article
- Outcome of tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the impact of laparoscopic resection.World journal of surgery · 2014Article
- Laparoscopic approach to gastrointestinal malignancies: toward the future with caution.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Current status of robotic surgery for rectal cancer: A bird's eye view.Journal of minimal access surgeryReview
- Robotic right colectomy: A worthwhile procedure? Results of a meta-analysis of trials comparing robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy.Journal of minimal access surgeryReview
- Robotic-laparoscopic rectal cancer excision versus traditional laparoscopy.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, an increasing number of reports have been published on robotic colorectal surgery; this modality has also garnered an increasing amount of attention from the colorectal society. Most of the interest has been in robotic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer. The purpose of this article is to briefly introduce our technique for total robotic TME and to review the recent literature regarding robotic TME for rectal cancer to summarize the current evidence on clinical and oncologic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23307506What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.