Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23307395›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2013

A matched-pair cluster-randomized trial of guided care for high-risk older patients.

Chad Boult, Bruce Leff, Cynthia M Boyd, Jennifer L Wolff, Jill A Marsteller, Kevin D Frick, Stephen Wegener, Lisa Reider, Katherine Frey, Tracy M Mroz and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Behaviour change techniques in personalised care planning for older people: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Pooled it
  9. Multicomponent interventions for enhancing primary care: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: a systematic review.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2020
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chad BoultJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. cboult@jhsph.edu
Bruce Leff
Cynthia M Boyd
Jennifer L Wolff
Jill A Marsteller
Kevin D Frick
Stephen Wegener
Lisa Reider
Katherine Frey
Tracy M Mroz
Lya Karm
Daniel O Scharfstein

Funding

Treatment Burden in Older Adults with Diabetes and MultimorbidityK23AG032910 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOYD, CYNTHIA MELINDA · 2009 to 2013
$533k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG032910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients at risk for generating high health care expenditures often receive fragmented, low-quality, inefficient health care. Guided Care is designed to provide proactive, coordinated, comprehensive care for such patients.

objectiveWe hypothesized that Guided Care, compared to usual care, produces better functional health and quality of care, while reducing the use of expensive health services.

design32-month, single-blind, matched-pair, cluster-randomized controlled trial of Guided Care, conducted in eight community-based primary care practices. PATIENTS: The "Hierarchical Condition Category" (HCC) predictive model was used to identify high-risk older patients who were insured by fee-for-service Medicare, a Medicare Advantage plan or Tricare. Patients with HCC scores in the highest quartile (at risk for generating high health care expenditures during the coming year) were eligible to participate.

interventionA registered nurse collaborated with two to five primary care physicians in providing eight services to participants: comprehensive assessment, evidence-based care planning, proactive monitoring, care coordination, transitional care, coaching for self-management, caregiver support, and access to community-based services. MAIN MEASURES: Functional health was measured using the Short Form-36. Quality of care and health services utilization were measured using the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care and health insurance claims, respectively. KEY

resultsOf the eligible patients, 904 (37.8 %) gave written consent to participate; of these, 477 (52.8 %) completed the final interview, and 848 (93.8 %) provided complete claims data. In intention-to-treat analyses, Guided Care did not significantly improve participants' functional health, but it was associated with significantly higher participant ratings of the quality of care (difference = 0.27, 95 % CI = 0.08-0.45) and 29 % lower use of home care (95 % CI = 3-48 %).

conclusionsGuided Care improves high-risk older patients' ratings of the quality of their care, and it reduces their use of home care, but it does not appear to improve their functional health.

Indexed as

AgedCommunity Health ServicesDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedFemaleHealth ExpendituresHealth ServicesHealth Services for the AgedHumansMalePatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareSingle-Blind MethodUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23307395
PMCPMC3631081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.