Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23307171›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2013

Population pharmacokinetic modeling and deconvolution of enantioselective absorption of eflornithine in the rat.

Carl-Christer Johansson, Peter Gennemark, Per Artursson, Angela Äbelö, Michael Ashton, Rasmus Jansson-Löfmark

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Input Estimation for Extended-Release Formulations Exemplified with Exenatide.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A modeling approach for compounds affecting body composition.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Carl-Christer JohanssonUnit for Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. c-c.johansson@telia.com
Peter Gennemark
Per Artursson
Angela Äbelö
Michael Ashton
Rasmus Jansson-Löfmark
University of Gothenburg · SEAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enantioselective pharmacokinetics and absorption of eflornithine in the rat was investigated using population pharmacokinetic modeling and a modified deconvolution method. Bidirectional permeability of L- and D-eflornithine was investigated in Caco-2 cells. The rat was administered racemic eflornithine hydrochloride as a single oral dose [40-3,000 mg/kg bodyweight (BW)] or intravenously (IV) (100-2,700 mg/kg BW infused over 60-400 min). Serial arterial blood samples were collected and L- and D-eflornithine were quantitated with a previously published chiral bioanalysis method. The D:L concentration ratio was determined in rat faeces. Intravenous L-and D-eflornithine plasma concentration-time data was analyzed using population pharmacokinetic modeling and described with a 3-compartment pharmacokinetic model with saturable binding to one of the peripheral compartments. Oral plasma concentration-time data was analyzed using a modified deconvolution method accounting for nonlinearities in the eflornithine pharmacokinetics. Clearance was similar for both enantiomers (3.36 and 3.09 mL/min). Oral bioavailability was estimated by deconvolution at 30 and 59% for L- and D-eflornithine. The D:L concentration ratio in feces was 0.49 and the Caco-2 cell permeability was similar for both enantiomers (6-10 × 10(-8) cm/s) with no evident involvement of active transport or efflux. The results presented here suggest that the difference in the bioavailability between eflornithine enantiomers is caused by a stereoselective difference in extent rather than rate of absorption. The presented modified deconvolution method made it possible to account for the non-linear component in the suggested three-compartment pharmacokinetic model thus rapidly estimating eflornithine oral bioavailability.

Indexed as

AbsorptionAnimalsBiological AvailabilityCaco-2 CellsCell Line, TumorEflornithineEnzyme InhibitorsHumansMaleMetabolic Clearance RateModels, BiologicalRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyStereoisomerismEflornithineEnzyme Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID23307171
OpenAlexW2055796544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.