Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23307128›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2013

A microfluidic electrochemiluminescent device for detecting cancer biomarker proteins.

Naimish P Sardesai, Karteek Kadimisetty, Ronaldo Faria, James F Rusling

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. 3D-Printed Immunosensor Arrays for Cancer Diagnostics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Recent Progress of Biomarker Detection Sensors.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Automated 4-Sample Protein Immunoassays using 3D-Printed Microfluidics.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Naimish P SardesaiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Karteek Kadimisetty
Ronaldo Faria
James F Rusling
University of Connecticut · USUConn Health · US

Funding

Protein Biosensor Arrays Based on NanomaterialsR01EB014586 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI RUSLING, JAMES F. · 2011 to 2014
$1.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS EB014586NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB014586
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe an electrochemiluminescence (ECL) immunoarray incorporated into a prototype microfluidic device for highly sensitive protein detection and apply this system to accurate, sensitive measurements of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in serum. The microfluidic system employed three molded polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) channels on a conductive pyrolytic graphite chip (2.5 × 2.5 cm) inserted into a machined chamber and interfaced with a pump, switching valve, and sample injector. Each of the three PDMS channels encompasses three 3 μL analytical wells. Capture-antibody-decorated single-wall carbon nanotube forests are fabricated in the bottom of the wells. The antigen is captured by these antibodies on the well bottoms. Then, a RuBPY-silica-secondary antibody (Ab2) label is injected to bind to antigen on the array, followed by injection of sacrificial reductant tripropylamine (TPrA) to produce ECL. For detection, the chip is placed into an open-top ECL measuring cell, and the channels are in contact with electrolyte in the chamber. Potential applied at 0.95 V versus Ag/AgCl oxidizes TPrA to produce ECL by redox cycling the RuBPY species in the particles, and ECL light is measured by a charge-coupled device camera. This approach achieved ultralow detection limits of 100 fg mL(-1) for PSA (9 zeptomole) and 10 fg mL(-1) (1 zeptomole) for IL-6 in calf serum, a 10-25-fold improvement of a similar non-microfluidic array. PSA and IL-6 in synthetic cancer patient serum samples were detected in 1.1 h and results correlated well with single-protein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ImmobilizedCattleDimethylpolysiloxanesElectrochemical TechniquesEquipment DesignGraphiteHumansImmunoassayInterleukin-6Limit of DetectionLuminescent MeasurementsMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesNeoplasmsProstate-Specific AntigenProtein Array AnalysisAntibodies, ImmobilizedbaysilonDimethylpolysiloxanesGraphiteInterleukin-6Prostate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID23307128
PMCPMC3610849
OpenAlexW2069825538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.