Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23306675›Full record

ReviewCommunity mental health journal2014

Review of community pharmacy staff educational needs for supporting mental health consumers and carers.

Amary Mey, Jane L Fowler, Kathy Knox, David H K Shum, Jasmina Fejzic, Laetitia Hattingh, Denise McConnell, Amanda Wheeler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Community mental health journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Australian mental health consumers' and carers' experiences of community pharmacy service.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amary MeySchool of Pharmacy, Griffith University, Gold Coast, 4222, Australia, a.mey@griffith.edu.au.
Jane L Fowler
Kathy Knox
David H K Shum
Jasmina Fejzic
Laetitia Hattingh
Denise McConnell
Amanda Wheeler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of a mental health education package for community pharmacy staff should be informed by mental health consumers/carers' needs, expectations and experiences, and staff knowledge, skills and attitudes. This review (1) explored research on community pharmacy practice and service provision for mental health consumers/carers, and (2) identified validated methods for assessing staff knowledge, skills and attitudes about mental illness to inform the development of a training questionnaire. A literature scan using key words knowledge, skills, attitudes, and beliefs combined with community pharmacy, pharmacist, and pharmacy support staff, and mental illness, depression, anxiety was conducted. A small number of studies were found that used reliable methods to assess pharmacists' training needs regarding mental illness and treatment options. There was little published specifically in relation to depression and anxiety in community pharmacy practice. No studies assessed the training needs of pharmacy support staff. A systematic analysis of pharmacy staff learning needs is warranted.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPatient Education as TopicPharmaciesProfessional CompetenceProfessional-Patient RelationsCaregiversCommunicationCurriculumHealth OccupationsMental DisordersPatient Medication KnowledgePrejudiceProfessional-Family RelationsPsychotropic DrugsWorkforcePsychotropic Drugs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.