ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2013
Erratum to: Interpersonal discrimination and health-related quality of life among black and white men and women in the United States.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Racial/Ethnic Discrimination on Quality of Life Among Breast Cancer Survivors.American journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- Racial Discrimination and Health-Related Quality of Life: An Examination Among Asian American Immigrants.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2022Article
- Predictors of STD Screening From the Indigenist Stress-Coping Model Among Native Adults With Binge Substance Use.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Longitudinal associations between self-reported experiences of discrimination and depressive symptoms in young women and men post- myocardial infarction.Journal of psychosomatic research · 2019Article
- Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management in Non-Hispanic Black Men: a Current State of the Literature.Current diabetes reports · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Republished from
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe assessed associations between discrimination and health-related quality of life among black and white men and women in the United States.
methodsWe examined data from the National Health Measurement Study, a nationally representative sample of 3,648 adults aged 35-89 in the non-institutionalized US population. These data include self-reported lifetime and everyday discrimination as well as several health utility indexes (EQ-5D, HUI3, and SF-6D). Multiple regression was used to compute mean health utility scores adjusted for age, income, education, and chronic diseases for each race-by-gender subgroup.
resultsBlack men and women reported more discrimination than white men and women. Health utility tended to be worse as reported discrimination increased. With a few exceptions, differences between mean health utility scores in the lowest and highest discrimination groups exceeded the 0.03 difference generally considered to be a clinically significant difference.
conclusionsPersons who experienced discrimination tended to score lower on health utility measures. The study also revealed a complex relationship between experiences of discrimination and race and gender. Because of these differential social and demographic relationships caution is urged when interpreting self-rated health measures in research, clinical, and policy settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.