Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23306583›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2013

Effects of infection control measures on acquisition of five antimicrobial drug-resistant microorganisms in a tetanus intensive care unit in Vietnam.

Constance Schultsz, Martinus C J Bootsma, Huynh T Loan, Tran T T Nga, Le T P Thao, Tran T D Thuy, James Campbell, Le M Vien, Ngo T Hoa, Nguyen V M Hoang and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Constance SchultszOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. schultsz@gmail.com
Martinus C J Bootsma
Huynh T Loan
Tran T T Nga
Le T P Thao
Tran T D Thuy
James Campbell
Le M Vien
Ngo T Hoa
Nguyen V M Hoang
Ferdinand Wit
Nguyen V V Chau
Jeremy Farrar
Marc J M Bonten
Lam M Yen
Hospital for Tropical Diseases · VNJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBOxford University Clinical Research Unit · VNUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo quantify the effects of barrier precautions and antibiotic mixing on prevalence and acquisition of five drug-resistant microorganisms within a single tetanus intensive care unit at a tertiary referral hospital in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

methodsAll patients admitted within the study period were included. After a 1-year baseline period, barrier precautions were implemented and the single empirical treatment ceftazidime was changed to mixing (per consecutive patient) of three different regimens (ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, piperacillin-tazobactam). Markov chain modeling and genotyping were used to determine the effects of interventions on prevalence levels and the relative importance of cross-transmission and antibiotic-associated selection.

resultsA total of 190 patients were included in year 1 (2,708 patient days, 17,260 cultures) and 167 patients in year 2 (3,384 patient days, 20,580 cultures). In year 1, average daily prevalence rates for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae (excluding Klebsiella pneumoniae), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, gentamicin-resistant K. pneumoniae, and amikacin-resistant Acinetobacter species were 34.0, 61.3, 53.4, 65.7 and 57.1 %. After intervention, ceftazidime usage decreased by 53 %; the use of piperacillin-tazobactam and ciprofloxacin increased 7.2-fold and 4.5-fold, respectively. Adherence to hand hygiene after patient contact was 54 %. These measures were associated with a reduction of MRSA prevalence by 69.8 % (to 10.3 %), mainly because of less cross-transmission (88 % reduction), and of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae prevalence by 10.3 % (non-significantly). In contrast, prevalence levels of the other three pathogens remained unaffected.

conclusionThe combination of simple infection control measures and antibiotic mixing was highly effective in reducing the prevalence of MRSA, but not of Gram-negative microorganisms.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Infective AgentsCeftazidimeChildChild, PreschoolCiprofloxacinDrug Resistance, MicrobialFemaleGram-Negative BacteriaHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfection ControlAnti-Infective AgentsCeftazidimeCiprofloxacinPenicillanic AcidPiperacillinPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID23306583
PMCPMC3607730
OpenAlexW2155955265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.