Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23305780›Full record

ReviewEpilepsy & behavior : E&B2013

Impact of early life exposure to antiepileptic drugs on neurobehavioral outcomes based on laboratory animal and clinical research.

Kevin G Bath, Helen E Scharfman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Valproate-induced neurodevelopmental deficits in Xenopus laevis tadpoles.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin G BathDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA. Kevin_Bath@Brown.edu
Helen E Scharfman
Brown University · USNYU Langone Health · US

Funding

BDNF AND HIPPOCAMPAL HYPEREXCITABILITYR01NS037562 · NINDS · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI SCHARFMAN, HELEN E · 1999 to 2010
$2.6M
Ectopic Granule Cells in the Dentate GyrusR21MH090606 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI SCHARFMAN, HELEN E · 2011 to 2012
$429k
BDNF and Hippocampal HyperexcitabilityR56NS037562 · NINDS · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI SCHARFMAN, HELEN E · 2008 to 2008
$355k
NIMH NIH HHS MH-090606NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH090606NINDS NIH HHS NS-37562NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS037562NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS037562
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epilepsy affects approximately 1% of children under the age of 15, making it a very common neurological disorder in the pediatric population (Russ et al., 2012). In addition, ~0.4-0.8% of all pregnant women have some form of epilepsy (Hauser et al., 1996a,b; Borthen et al., 2009; Krishnamurthy, 2012). Despite the potential deleterious effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on the developing brain, their use is still required for seizure control in pregnant women (Krishnamurthy, 2012), and they represent the standard approach for treating children with epilepsy (Chu-Shore and Thiele, 2010; Quach et al., 2010; Verrotti et al., 2011). Even when AEDs are effective, there are potential side effects, including cognitive and affective changes or altered sleep and appetite. The consequences of AED exposure in development have been studied extensively (Canger et al., 1999; Modi et al., 2011a,b; Oguni, 2011). Despite intensive study, there is still debate about the long-term consequences of early life AED exposure. Here, we consider the evidence to date that AED exposure, either prenatally or in early postnatal life, has significant adverse effects on the developing brain and incorporate studies of laboratory animals as well as those of patients. We also note the areas of research where greater clarity seems critical in order to make significant advances. A greater understanding of the impact of AEDs on somatic, cognitive and behavioral development has substantial value because it has the potential to inform clinical practice and guide studies aimed at understanding the genetic and molecular bases of comorbid pathologies associated with common treatment regimens. Understanding these effects has the potential to lead to AEDs with fewer side effects. Such advances would expand treatment options, diminish the risk associated with AED exposure in susceptible populations, and improve the quality of life and health outcomes of children with epilepsy and children born to women who took AEDs during pregnancy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnticonvulsantsCognition DisordersEpilepsyFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAnticonvulsants

Identifiers

PMID23305780
PMCPMC3925312
OpenAlexW2148549516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.