Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23305619›Full record

ReviewTrends in parasitology2013

Dual core processing: MRB1 is an emerging kinetoplast RNA editing complex.

Hassan Hashimi, Sara L Zimmer, Michelle L Ammerman, Laurie K Read, Julius Lukeš

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in parasitology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mitochondrial RNA editing inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hassan HashimiInstitute of Parasitology, Biology Center, Czech Academy of Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice (Budweis) 370 05, Czech Republic.
Sara L Zimmer
Michelle L Ammerman
Laurie K Read
Julius Lukeš

Funding

Regulation of RNA editing in Trypansoma bruceiR01AI061580 · NIAID · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI READ, LAURIE K. · 2006 to 2015
$3.0M
Fundamental Aspects of Kinetoplastid Mitochondrial RNA StabilityF32AI092902 · NIAID · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI ZIMMER, SARA LANA · 2011 to 2013
$113k
NIAID NIH HHS F32 AI092902NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI061580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of kinetoplastid RNA (kRNA) editing has centered on this paradigm: guide RNAs (gRNAs) provide a blueprint for uridine insertion/deletion into mitochondrial mRNAs by the RNA editing core complex (RECC). The characterization of constituent subunits of the mitochondrial RNA-binding complex 1 (MRB1) implies that it too is vital to the editing process. The recently elucidated MRB1 architecture will be instrumental in putting functional data from individual subunits into context. Our model depicts two functions for MRB1: mediating multi-round kRNA editing by coordinating the exchange of multiple gRNAs required by RECC to edit lengthy regions of mRNAs, and then linking kRNA editing with other RNA processing events.

Indexed as

RNA EditingKinetoplastidaProtozoan ProteinsRNA, Guide, KinetoplastidaRNA, MessengerRNA, ProtozoanTrypanosoma brucei bruceiUridineProtozoan ProteinsRNA, Guide, KinetoplastidaRNA, MessengerRNA, ProtozoanUridine

Identifiers

PMID23305619
PMCPMC3558622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.