Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23305361›Full record

ReviewCurrent protein & peptide science2012

Interactions in bacterial biofilm development: a structural perspective.

James A Garnett, Steve Matthews

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current protein & peptide science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Comparison of Antibiotics' Resistance Patterns ofInfectious disorders drug targets · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biofilm-a Syntrophic Consortia of Microbial Cells: Boon or Bane?Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  8. The Determination, Monitoring, Molecular Mechanisms and Formation of Biofilm in E. coli.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Biofilm and its implications postfracture fixation: All I need to know.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James A GarnettCentre for Structural Biology, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Steve Matthews

Funding

Medical Research Council G1001664Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A community-based life style is the normal mode of growth and survival for many bacterial species. These cellular accretions or biofilms are initiated upon recognition of solid phases by cell surface exposed adhesive moieties. Further cell-cell interactions, cell signalling and bacterial replication leads to the establishment of dense populations encapsulated in a mainly self-produced extracellular matrix; this comprises a complex mixture of macromolecules. These fascinating architectures protect the inhabitants from radiation damage, dehydration, pH fluctuations and antimicrobial compounds. As such they can cause bacterial persistence in disease and problems in industrial applications. In this review we discuss the current understandings of these initial biofilm-forming processes based on structural data. We also briefly describe latter biofilm maturation and dispersal events, which although lack high-resolution insights, are the present focus for many structural biologists working in this field. Finally we give an overview of modern techniques aimed at preventing and disrupting problem biofilms.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial AdhesionBacterial ProteinsBiofilmsBiopolymersBacterial ProteinsBiopolymers

Identifiers

PMID23305361
PMCPMC3601411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.