Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23305192›Full record

Trial reportHealth and quality of life outcomes2013

Validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in assessing and valuing health status in patients with somatoform disorders.

Christian Brettschneider, Hans-Helmut König, Wolfgang Herzog, Claudia Kaufmann, Rainer Schaefert, Alexander Konnopka

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quality of life and mortality after surgical treatment for vertebral osteomyelitis (VO): a prospective study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christian BrettschneiderDepartment of Medical Sociology and Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. c.brettschneider@uke.de
Hans-Helmut König
Wolfgang Herzog
Claudia Kaufmann
Rainer Schaefert
Alexander Konnopka

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe EQ-5D is a generic questionnaire providing a preference-based index score applicable to cost-utility analysis. This is the first study to validate the EQ-5D in patients with somatoform disorders.

methodsData of the EQ-5D descriptive system, the British and the German EQ-5D index and the EQ Visual Analogue Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire 15, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9, the Whiteley Index 7 and the Short Form 36 were collected from 294 patients at baseline, 244 at 6 months and 256 at 12 months after baseline. The discriminative ability of the EQ-5D was evaluated by comparison with a general population sample and by the ability to distinguish between different symptom severities. Convergent validity was analysed by assessing associations between the EQ-5D and the other instruments. Responsiveness was evaluated by analysing the effects on scores between two measurements in groups of patients reporting worse, same or better health. The Bonferroni correction was employed.

resultsFor all items of the EQ-5D except 'self-care', patients with somatoform disorders reported more problems than the general population. The EQ-5D showed discriminative ability in patients with different symptom severities. For nearly all reference instruments there were significant differences in mean scores between respondents with and without problems in the various EQ-5D items and strong correlations with the EQ Visual Analogue Scale and the EQ-5D index scores. Evidence for the responsiveness of the EQ-5D could only be found for patients with better health; effects were medium at the utmost.

conclusionsThe EQ-5D showed a considerable validity and a limited responsiveness in patients with somatoform disorders.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN55280791.

Indexed as

Health StatusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychological TestsPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexSomatoform DisordersSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID23305192
PMCPMC3547767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.