Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23304655›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2013

Advancing the translation of optical imaging agents for clinical imaging.

Eva M Sevick-Muraca, Walter J Akers, Bishnu P Joshi, Gary D Luker, Cathy S Cutler, Lawrence J Marnett, Christopher H Contag, Thomas D Wang, Ali Azhdarinia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A Modular Dual-Labeling Scaffold That Retains Agonistic Properties for Somatostatin Receptor Targeting.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2017
    Article
  5. Synthesis of a Fluorescently LabeledACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Eva M Sevick-MuracaThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Center for Molecular Imaging, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, 1825 Pressler Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Walter J Akers
Bishnu P Joshi
Gary D Luker
Cathy S Cutler
Lawrence J Marnett
Christopher H Contag
Thomas D Wang
Ali Azhdarinia
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USStanford University · USUniversity of Missouri · USVanderbilt University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Task Specific Project 3: Diffuse Optical TomographyU54CA136398 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MINTUN, MARK A. · 2008 to 2012
$6.0M
Task Specific Project 2U54CA136465 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WENDER, PAUL ANTHONY · 2008 to 2013
$5.3M
Task Specific Project 4U54CA136429 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI REHEMTULLA, ALNAWAZ · 2008 to 2012
$5.2M
Task Specific Project 4U54CA136404 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI SEVICK, EVA M. · 2008 to 2012
$5.1M
Targeted Multi-Spectral Dual Axes Confocal Imaging of In Vivo Molecular ExpressioR01CA142750 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KURABAYASHI, KATSUO, LUKER, GARY D · 2010 to 2014
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142750NCI NIH HHS U54 CA136398NCI NIH HHS U54 CA136404NCI NIH HHS U54 CA136429NCI NIH HHS U54 CA136465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the development of a large number of promising candidates, few contrast agents for established medical imaging modalities have successfully been translated over the past decade. The emergence of new imaging contrast agents that employ biomedical optics is further complicated by the relative infancy of the field and the lack of approved imaging devices compared to more established clinical modalities such as nuclear medicine. Herein, we propose a navigational approach (as opposed to a fixed "roadmap") for translation of optical imaging agents that is (i) proposed through consensus by four academic research programs that are part of the cooperative U54 NCI Network for Translational Research, (ii) developed through early experiences for translating optical imaging agents in order to meet distinctly varied needs in cancer diagnostics, and (iii) adaptable to the rapidly changing environment of academic medicine. We describe the pathways by which optical imaging agents are synthesized, qualified, and validated for preclinical testing, and ultimately translated for "first-in-humans" studies using investigational optical imaging devices. By identifying and adopting consensus approaches for seemingly disparate optical imaging modalities and clinical indications, we seek to establish a systematic method for navigating the ever-changing "roadmap" to most efficiently arrive at the destination of clinical adoption and improved outcome and survivorship for cancer patients.

Indexed as

(170.0170) Medical optics and biotechnology(170.3880) Medical and biological imaging(170.3890) Medical optics instrumentation

Identifiers

PMID23304655
PMCPMC3539189
OpenAlexW2044899875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.