Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23304640›Full record

ArticleStroke research and treatment2012

Seven capital devices for the future of stroke rehabilitation.

M Iosa, G Morone, A Fusco, M Bragoni, P Coiro, M Multari, V Venturiero, D De Angelis, L Pratesi, S Paolucci

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke research and treatment, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04611360 (Effects of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Mobility and Balance in Post Stroke Patients.), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04611360 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Mobility and Balance in Post Stroke Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2019 to 2019Enrolled40ConditionsStrokeArmsAnodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Group, Conventional Training Exercises Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Impact of Mobile Games-Aided Neurorehabilitation: A Systematic Literature Review.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

M IosaClinical Laboratory of Experimental Neurorehabilitation, Santa Lucia Foundation I.R.C.C.S., Via Ardeatina 306, 00179 Rome, Italy.
G Morone
A Fusco
M Bragoni
P Coiro
M Multari
V Venturiero
D De Angelis
L Pratesi
S Paolucci

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability for adults in industrialized societies. Rehabilitation's efforts are tended to avoid long-term impairments, but, actually, the rehabilitative outcomes are still poor. Novel tools based on new technologies have been developed to improve the motor recovery. In this paper, we have taken into account seven promising technologies that can improve rehabilitation of patients with stroke in the early future: (1) robotic devices for lower and upper limb recovery, (2) brain computer interfaces, (3) noninvasive brain stimulators, (4) neuroprostheses, (5) wearable devices for quantitative human movement analysis, (6) virtual reality, and (7) tablet-pc used for neurorehabilitation.

Identifiers

PMID23304640
PMCPMC3530851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.