ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2012
Improving the accuracy of therapy descriptions in clinical trials using a bottom-up approach.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating a Novel Summary Visualization for Clinical Trial Reports: A Usability Study.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Randomized clinical trial (RCT) reports commonly have complicated therapy descriptions that are written in free-text. Drug therapy is difficult to describe due to the dynamic nature of how protocols change and the many ways drugs can be administered. Details regarding protocol changes and drug administration must be explained clearly for reproducibility and reliability. A process model supplemented with concept ontologies can clarify the dynamics of how therapies change and make knowledge more explicit. We demonstrated the process to develop a representation model to reveal specific context concerning drug therapies within clinical trial report literature. A PubMed search was conducted to identify RCTs on non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pertaining to epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Twenty-seven clinical trials were used to develop the model using a bottom-up approach. This representation describes drug dosage, administration details, and drug cycles within different experimental arms and control groups. We then presented preliminary evaluation of the clarity and understandability of the representation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23304419PMC3540541What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.