Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23304398›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2012

A qualitative analysis of EHR clinical document synthesis by clinicians.

Oladimeji Farri, David S Pieckiewicz, Ahmed S Rahman, Terrence J Adam, Serguei V Pakhomov, Genevieve B Melton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A scoping review of therapeutic reasoning process research.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Building the evidence-base to reduce electronic health record-related clinician burden.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Safe Interorganizational Health Information Exchange During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Automated methods for the summarization of electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Oladimeji FarriInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
David S Pieckiewicz
Ahmed S Rahman
Terrence J Adam
Serguei V Pakhomov
Genevieve B Melton

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)KL2TR000113 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$5.4M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinicians utilize electronic health record (EHR) systems during time-constrained patient encounters where large amounts of clinical text must be synthesized at the point of care. Qualitative methods may be an effective approach for uncovering cognitive processes associated with the synthesis of clinical documents within EHR systems. We utilized a think-aloud protocol and content analysis with the goal of understanding cognitive processes and barriers involved as medical interns synthesized patient clinical documents in an EHR system to accomplish routine clinical tasks. Overall, interns established correlations of significance and meaning between problem, symptom and treatment concepts to inform hypotheses generation and clinical decision-making. Barriers identified with synthesizing EHR documents include difficulty searching for patient data, poor readability, redundancy, and unfamiliar specialized terms. Our study can inform recommendations for future designs of EHR clinical document user interfaces to aid clinicians in providing improved patient care.

Indexed as

CognitionElectronic Health RecordsInternship and ResidencyHumansPhysicians

Identifiers

PMID23304398
PMCPMC3540510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.